SOL tolls from date of LAST activity. Search in your browser on "CA + Limitation of Actions"
no
DID the lender get a judgment for the balance due? Demand verification of the debt from CA. NO verification, NO PAY...
lawhelp.org/GA
CALL a local attorney NOW.
These are your rights under Federal and State Law. The FCRA, FDCPA, and CROA all protect you (the consumer) and give you certain rights to protect yourself from the credit bureaus, creditors, collection agencies, and credit repair companies.
The car company generally has to give you notice before going through with a repossession. Also, they should give you the opportunity to pay the outstanding bill before resorting to a repossession.
bill of rights
How di you get gun rights back in the state of California
In Michigan, repossession laws for mobile homes are governed by both state laws and the terms of the loan or lease agreement. If a borrower defaults on their loan, the lender may initiate repossession, which typically requires following specific legal procedures, including providing notice to the borrower. The lender must also comply with the Michigan Mobile Home Commission Act, which outlines the rights of both parties. It's important for borrowers to understand their rights and seek legal advice if facing repossession.
You do not have any rights on it. You must make your payments if you want to keep living in it. RVs are not meant to be lived in full time.
Depends on state law, in Montana absolutely not... if it comes to a forced repo (bank has contacted you and asked you to turn over and you have not), your car will be "legally stolen" by the bank. You will not have any rights to anything left in the car at the time of repossession. If your bank has contacted you, they have done their "good faith" duty in trying to recover their asset without damaging you (ie, please turn the car in ASAP).
The California vs. Greenwood case was significant in establishing that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their trash left outside for collection. This decision limited Fourth Amendment protections in regards to privacy rights, allowing law enforcement to search through trash without a warrant.