The same as the original.
No humans have been cloned yet. Should a human ever be cloned, then presumably, the clone would be identical (genetically) to the original from which it is copied; thus, it would be a human.
yes, cloned people in Brazil should have equal rights. The same rights that a normal person does.
The only way a human has been cloned is if the government has done it secretly or the gov. doesn't know about it. Other than that no a human has not 'yet' been cloned. But they have sucsessfully cloned a sheep.
Cloned humans would be biologically identical to the original, so they would have the potential to reproduce like any other human. However, ethical and legal considerations may prevent the cloning of humans for reproductive purposes, as there are significant moral and practical concerns associated with human cloning.
No scientist haven't yet cloned a human
Cats cannot be cloned.
Cloning is considered unethical by some because of concerns related to individuality, consent, and potential exploitation of the cloned individual. There are also worries about the long-term effects of human cloning on society and the implications for human rights and dignity. Additionally, there are scientific and technical risks associated with cloning, such as genetic abnormalities and health issues in the cloned individual.
None. Human cloning has never been carried out anywhere.
As of today, scientists have not cloned any people. They have only cloned animals and are still trying to find the symptoms of cloning. If it is harmless, scientists may start cloning people. If it is harmful, you will not might hear about clones in this world....
in 1997 the first Transgenic cow was Rosie,who produced human protein-enriched milk at (2.4 grams per litre).The milk contained the human protein alpha lactalbumin.
Contributions have been made in the field of human rights by the UN, an organisation which embodies the ideals of internationalism.An example of thiss would be the universal declaration of human rights.
In the broadest sense, it is a human rights violation not to treat a human being like a human being. Racism is the intentional relegation of an ethnic community to a sub-human state, and thus is not, eo ipso, a "violation" of human rights, but it *is* indicative of an attitude which would *want* to violate human rights.