299
299 is probably the intended meaning of this improperly formed Roman numeral .
Because under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system 299 is CCXCIX But under the rules governing the Roman numeral system during the Roman era itself 299 can be proven to work out as ICCC and not CCIC because 300-1 = 299 A good question nevertheless.
In all probability the Romans themselves would have wrote out 299 as ICCC But today's modern way of writing out 299 into Roman numerals is CCXCIX
CCXCIX
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 299 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
324 written in roman numeral is CCCXXIV
No, K is not a roman numeral.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
The roman numeral for one is I.
Vivid is not a Roman numeral