0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are genesis and the big bang theory the same?
No. Genesis is a book of the Bible, and is based on faith. The Big Bang Theory is a scientific theory based on astrophysic and cosmological calculations. That said, there are many who see some overlap to the creation and sequence of events the bible lays out in Genesis, and the BB theory.
What is a scientific explanation for a range of hypothesis and observations supported by testing?
i have no clue i also want that answer for homework
Are Religious and Scientific Theories of Creation Compatible?
Theory of Creation is not an acknowledge scientific theory. Science proposed Abiogenesis where life come to exist without need of creation. The Theory of Creation that require the supreme being to create life namely Intelligent Design (ID) had no root of support at all for the existence of God, Deities or Supreme being and their action. The Theory of Abiogenesis while lack of evidence supporting the full process, ID in other hand had nothing at all. The Theory of Creation by far believe in using irreducible complex to stated the process of Abiogenesis impossibility but it had nothing supporting even the existence of the creator. Degree of controversies among Religion to Science varies among religion of concern. Abrahamic's supporter usually in denial of the Abiogenesis theory and try to coin up their theory of creation. Indian's origin usually had nothing to concern or against the Abiogenesis and let the Science be. After all, even if Abiogenesis is not compatible to some of religions, it should not be put to bother since Abiogenesis is still on the long way of study. If the story of creation would be true, there would be the evidence in supporting. What we should do is seeking of evidence and not let the faith blind human process of seeking out truth.
What primary difference between a scientific theory and a hypothesis is that a theory is?
A scientific theory is more elaborated than a simple hypothesis and generally is validated by experiments.
Are trilobite fossils older than fish fossils?
No. Trilobytes are the oldest fossils ever found. They are the reason the theory of evolution is still only a theory. They were complex organisms with all the basic organs, complex eyes and a respitory sytem. If evolution is true, why for over two centuries have no fossils been found leading up to their evolutionary "place."
Does Dr George Marshall support creation theory?
There is no scientific theory of creation.
What is the scientific theory of creation?
The Big Bang theory is the current scientific theory used to explain the origin of the universe.
Is there scientific proof for creation?
There is no scientific proof of a biblical creation. That is a matter of faith alone. The scientific consensus is that the universe came about as a result of an event popularly called the "Big Bang" which occurred around 13.7 billion years ago.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is Oscillation theory?
the oscillating theory of the universe suggests that the creation of this universe followed the death of the last universe. bethany punter wrote this - scientific genius :) hey scientific genius :) (bethany punter)
What is the study of fossils scientific and the study of special creation is not?
The answer to the question "Why is..." or "What makes..." is due to something called scientific method. The method entails generating an hypotheses, which can then be validated by independently gathered observable, empirical and measurable data.If all the currently available data does not contradict the hypotheses it is accepted as the current theory. As such evolution is a current theory which is not contradicted by current fact. Hence the study of fossils follows these principles, where as special creation can not be validated independently. ie. The text in the bible can not be tested by scientific method, since there are no observations that can be done that show the earth was created in 7 days, nor any observable data that corroborates that fact, rather data that contradicts that fact, and hence the bible (and most religious texts) fail as "hypotheses" since in scientific method nothing is fact, and the bible may be spiritual fact, but has failed the test of scientific validation.The study of fossils is paleontology.Hope this ansewered the forst part of your question.
Is there a credible scientific theory that opposes evolution?
The argument against the theory of evolution is Creation ex-nihilo ['out of nothing'] by God, sometimes called the Intelligent Design, or ID, theory. = =
Why fossils support the theory of continental movement?
explain how fossils support the theory of continental movement
Is fossil record considered scientific theory?
Probably more in the line of many converging pieces of evidence in support of theory. Theory is explanation and fossils are just mineralized bones in the rock. which need and explanation. The fossil record supports the theory of evolution by natural selection and, some say, the theory of punctuated equilibrium.
What is the difference a scientific theory and a scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
What is the difference a scientific theory and scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
What was the last scientific theory to challenge the theory of evolution?
No scientific theory ever challenged the theory of evolution.
What is the difference between scientific theory?
Between Scientific Theory and what?
