The answer is very complex.
First of all, the se netars ja cke d off to much, and a te to much fu c k from the f uc k n u t s. Secondly, the citizens began pi s si n g and s hi ting everywhere in rep ulsion to the Gae y se x and forced nu d it y acts that the cene ters were for cing. The alie ns were atracted to the big kun ts of the wimen there, and started sucking g them up there as se s and flyin g away with them. This made b ob very an gry, and he st opped repairing the portal causing massive dimen sional warp ing and ga s cloud fluctuation. Lastly, the Jamaifca ns attacked way to much, causing the u pperclass wimen to be sent away to Tur ke y where they could indul ge on opi um and utilize their k un ts for money to send back to Rome.
Feel free to edit my great answer, and to stop by and mas te r bat e with me sometime. Proud pro perty of Wik i An swer s.
I think the most serious problem was lead poisoning. Wars also destroyed part of it too. Aquaducts (big structures that held water) were lead-lined and when the villiagers drank it, they became poisoned.
The Roman Republic was brought down by the weight of imperial expansion. The central government had become dysfunctional, and lost control over the provinces (conquered territories). The governors of the provinces became unruly and treated their provinces as if they were their personal fiefs. Tax collection in the provinces was carried out by private collectors who 'farmed' the taxes to line their pockets. Corruption was rampant. There was mass poverty. A reform of military recruitment made the soldiers loyal to the commanders of their legions who could use them to obtain what they wanted through the threat of or the use of military violence. In 71 BC Crassus and Pompey encamped their troops outside Rome to have themselves elected as consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). Pompey was not even eligible on the grounds of being below the required age and of not having served some public offices which were required before the consulship. In the last 64 years of the Republic there were 12 civil wars. In 88 BC Sulla entered the city of Rome with his troops during his first civil war against forces of Marius, even though Roman religion forbade the bearing of arms within the city walls.
Another problem in the Late Republic was the increase in the number of dispossessed peasants who lost their land to the expanding landed estates which used slave labour. These people flocked to Rome to try to eke out a living, swelling the masses of the poor in the city. The problem of poverty became a political hot potato which led to the conflict between the populares and the optimates. The former was a political faction which championed the cause of the poor and tried to introduce reforms to help them. The latter was a conservative political faction which favoured the aristocracy and opposed reforms. The senators were seen as being concerned with the interests of the aristocracy, rather than those of the poor and were unpopular among the middle and lower classes. They were also seen as being corrupt.
Many of the civil wars were related to clashes between strong military leaders and the conflict between populares and optimates spilling into violence. These civil wars tore Rome apart and eventually led to the fall of the Republic. It was replaced by absolute rule by one man: the emperor.
It was the Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, Marius and Sulla,and finallySpartacus
The Germanic peoples who invaded in the late 2nd Century BCE.
Julius Caesar did not change the type of government. He introduced reforms which concentrated power in his hands, but did not change the type of government. He ruled during the late period of the Roman Republic and when he died Rome was still a republic. Rome's government changed from a republic to rule by emperors after Caesar's assassination
The last king of Rome was expelled in the late 6th Century BCE. The Punic Wars were in the 3rd and 2nd Centuries BCE, when Rome was a republic.
In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.In the very early days of Rome, the patricians were the wealthy ruling class and the plebeians were the disenfranchised. Over time the plebeians gained rights, prestige and status. By the mid to late republic the only difference was in the roots of their names. Both classes were considered the nobility as they could trace their ancestry back to the original founders of Rome. The newcomers, the proletariat, could not.
No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.
hunger, war, diseases, accidents.
As with all manufacturing industries, challenges to the steel industry in the mid-to-late 2000s were expected to come from inequitable foreign market competition.
Some examples of challenges faced by immigrants in the late 1800s were:- unable to speak English- overcrowding of the cities- unable to find jobs
nOW THE ROMAN HAS LESS SENATORS? AND DIFFERENT BELIEFS.
The Germanic peoples who invaded in the late 2nd Century BCE.
Because the Emperor wanted power, and he was constantly battling with the senate.
Julius Caesar did not change the type of government. He introduced reforms which concentrated power in his hands, but did not change the type of government. He ruled during the late period of the Roman Republic and when he died Rome was still a republic. Rome's government changed from a republic to rule by emperors after Caesar's assassination
It's a matter of words and how they are used. The city of Rome is the city itself. Imperial Rome is often used to designate Rome's authority. Such as Dacia became a part of imperial Rome, or Pompeii was a city in imperial Rome. Imperial Rome can be used as a synonym for Roman empire.
The last king of Rome was expelled in the late 6th Century BCE. The Punic Wars were in the 3rd and 2nd Centuries BCE, when Rome was a republic.
Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.Both classes participated in the governing of Rome once the plebeians gained their civil rights. The plebeians had their assemblies recognized, and were able to run for public office in addition to electing their tribunes. By the mid to late republic, one consul had to be a patrician and the other had to be a plebeian.
they had no life that's what the challenges were
They had to borrow money to buy seed, fertilize, and equipment