0
a landmark decision
Added: An un-explored legal area or question of law that has never been addressed before or one that has been re-examined and newly interpreted.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do decisions of appellate courts have the force of laws?
When an appeal court decides a case, it issues a written opinion that sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. All lower courts in the jurisdiction where the precedent was issuesd must follow it
What does it mean to say that supreme court decisions establish legal precedent?
As the highest court in the US, a ruling by the Supreme Court can not be challanged legally.In effect lower courts must make rulings on cases in line with any historic, relavent Supreme Court decisions (or their rulings will be overturned by higher courts).This means that a ruling by the Supreme Court sets the US legal standard - sets a precedent."precedent" means coming before another or others in time, place, rank, or sequence.
Which is the only court that sets precedent for all US courts?
The Supreme Court of the United States
Is court precedent mandatory or persuasive?
That depends on which court you're referring to. In the federal court system, the US Supreme Court sets binding (or mandatory) precedent for all lower courts; the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedent for all US District Courts within their jurisdiction, but only persuasive precedent elsewhere; the US District Courts do not set binding precedent at all, they only set persuasive precedent.
What does a ruling become for future decisions once the supreme court rules on a case?
Once the Supreme Court rules on a case, the ruling becomes binding precedent for future decisions. This means that lower courts are required to follow and apply the same legal principles established in the Supreme Court's ruling when deciding similar cases in the future. The ruling sets a legal standard that must be followed unless it is later overruled or modified by a subsequent Supreme Court decision.
What determines a binding precedent?
A binding precedent is determined by the decision of a higher court on a legal issue. It sets a legal rule that must be followed by lower courts in the same jurisdiction when deciding similar cases. Binding precedents are typically created by appellate courts, such as a supreme court, and establish legal principles that guide future decisions.
How do you put precedent into a sentence?
This to a large extent sets a precedent for the rest of the exhibition
What is a decision in a case that sets forth a new legal principle establishing a precedent?
Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. (Obiter dictum is a judicial opinion or incidental comment that is not legally binding.)
What is an example of a precedent in relation to interpreting law?
A precedent is a case that set the basis for any later case to be judged on, if it has the same principles. This is so cases of the same type may get the same outcome, depending on the circumstances.
When judges make laws they?
Judges do not make law, they set precedent. The Legislature forms and passes statutes. Once someone is taken to court in violation of a statute, the Judge interpret the law and sets precedent for how the law should be interpreted in the future by equal courts within that district.
What US Supreme Court case set a precedent?
Yes. All published opinions (majority, concurring, dissenting, etc.) except per curiam (unsigned opinions) may be cited as precedent. The US Supreme Court's official "opinion of the Court" (usually the majority decision) supersedes all lower court opinions, and sets binding precedent which both federal and state courts* are supposed to follow under the doctrine of stare decisis.* US Supreme Court decisions apply to state courts if they involve incorporated parts of the US Constitution, or federal laws that apply to (or within) the states.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is the importance of precedent?
Canada and most of its provinces (except Quebec) follow the common law system. One of the key principles of this system is that the law should be applied uniformly. Case law sets a precedent for how the law applies to specific situations, and courts make heavy use of it to ensure that the law is being consistently applied. Once a court rules on a matter of law, the courts are bound by the precedent, though a higher court may overturn the ruling and, of course, Parliament can amend the law.
