Judges do not make law, they set precedent. The Legislature forms and passes statutes. Once someone is taken to court in violation of a statute, the Judge interpret the law and sets precedent for how the law should be interpreted in the future by equal courts within that district.
Judges don't make laws, governments legislatures do.
judges do not make laws.. they only interpret them and give their ruling accordingly
Yes. Contrary to popular opinion, judges do not make laws.
o yes
No! Judges are NEVER in positions of power to please the government! They are there to make sure LAWS are applied equally in Courts and to uphold those laws.
Judges are meant to interpret what they think the law(s) mean, and follow the means of law in court form their interpretation but they aren't meant to make laws to fit their ruling or make laws at all( that's legislative).
In the United States, judges have qualified immunity, which protects them from civil liability when carrying out their official duties. This doctrine was established by the Supreme Court to ensure that judges can make decisions without fear of personal legal consequences, provided they do not violate clearly established legal rights.
they can make sure the laws are enforced, appoint judges, and approve bills
laws are created by the government judges enforce law and have the jusy and lawyers convine them on how
No, federal judges should not be able to create new laws since that's the job of the legislature. Judges should only interpret existing laws instead of trying to write them.
And your question is ... ?
Judges interpret the laws and legislators (or politicians) enact the laws. The separation of powers requires that the judiciary and the legislative branches remain separate, and accordingly judges should remain politically neutral.