To document the findings or document that there were no findings or that they were in conclusive
scientist analyes their experiment
No, absolutely not. You should be making observations as you go, and recording them. Then, when the experiment is over you can draw conclusions, but if you wait till after to record your observations, you won't remember them all.
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
The Scientific Method consists of the following parts:Define a questionGather information and resources (observe)Form an explanatory hypothesisTest the hypothesis by performing an experiment and collecting data in a reproduceable mannerAnalyze the dataInterpret the data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesisPublish resultsRetest (frequently done by other scientists)
The conclusion is based on the data that you got from the experiment (experimental results). To write a conclusion you should tell if your hypothesis was correct or incorrect then support your answer from your data. You should always use Quantitative details from the data.
data from repeated trials of the experiment
scientist analyes their experiment
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
No they shoudnt have.
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
A classical experiment should provide the researcher with reliable and valid data to test a hypothesis. It should allow the researcher to establish cause-and-effect relationships and draw meaningful conclusions based on the results.
A scientists should form a hypothesis, then conduct an experiment.
They should try again. Then check very carefully and see if they did the experiment correctly. They may have to change their hypothesis.
If you wish to write an essay about a science experiment, you should describe the purpose of the experiment, and the way in which the experiment was performed, and the results of the experiment, and the conclusions that are drawn from those results. If you want to be fancy, you might also describe what further experiments may be needed to continue to explore the subject of the first experiment.
No, absolutely not. You should be making observations as you go, and recording them. Then, when the experiment is over you can draw conclusions, but if you wait till after to record your observations, you won't remember them all.
Whenever possible, a hypothesis should be tested by an experiment in which only one variable is changed at a time. All other variables should be kept untouched and unchanged. Scientists use the data from a controlled experiment to explain the steps and outcomes that produced their final product.
I think you should conduct your own experiment and research and form your own conclusions.