Want this question answered?
r67rh667ur4ru
The colonists' refusal to buy goods from the British was referred to as a boycott. This was initially done as a reaction to the Stamp Act of 1765.
Colonist did only one thing to get the British to change their policies. The only thing they did was write the British letters.
That they did not do it on the colonists account, but on their own account
Things were beginning to get out of hand, something had to be done to set the colonists straight and put the goverenment back in control.
They could have allowed the colonies to have representation in the British Parliament. The colonists would not have minded taxation as much had there been representation from the colonies.
Things were beginning to get out of hand, something had to be done to set the colonists straight and put the goverenment back in control.
The British had made the colonists branch away from their government because the king had done several things under his rule that upset the colonists.
The British had made the colonists branch away from their government because the king had done several things under his rule that upset the colonists.
because dick was made
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
The colonists were instructed by the British not to cross the imaginary north to south line they projected down the crest of the Appalachian Mountains. This was done to prevent attacks by the Native American tribes that lived in the west. A lot of colonists rejected this rule and moved west anyway.