answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It is probable that your evidence is wrong on both counts. Research further and you may find an alternative answer which is probably the right one.

OR

Decide which answer has the most merit by looking at the supporting evidence

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Weigh the evidence for each argument, then decide which is the most convincing. Maybe your conclusion will be that what you thought initially is incorrect. Or perhaps you will have additional information to present, with good reasons why it doesn't work that way. In either case, don't ever bury the information. Present all of the evidence, and then explain why you think it supports your conclusion. Explain any discrepancies to the best of your ability, but allow other people to draw their own conclusions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What should you do if in the process of researching your question you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if in the process of gathering information about a research question you find evidence that supports two opposing conclusions?

Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit


Can you subpoena the opposing party for evidence in small claims?

This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.


An oversimplification differs from a sound generalization because it?

results from a complex analysis of all available evidence. :)


Do you have to get approval of your evidence from opposing lawyer before a trial?

you as a defendant are entitled to all discovery from the prosecutor. If that did not answer your question, please be more clearer on what you need to know.


What is sub conclusions?

it is when you ask a question and answer it


When do you draw conclusions?

When you think you have found the answer to your question.


How do they know that the earth has 5 layers?

Take anything anyone says as a pinch of salt. Come to your own conclusions and look for your own evidence in everything in life. Question everything. Were far from computers.. We are human :-)


To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?

Answer this question… check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.


How do you evaluate the effectiveness of researching information from a text?

One way to evaluate the effectiveness of researching information from a text is by assessing the relevance and accuracy of the information to your research question or topic. You can also consider the credibility of the sources cited in the text and evaluate how well the information supports your arguments or conclusions. Additionally, examining the depth and breadth of the information presented in the text can help you gauge its effectiveness for your research purposes.


What is the other side allowed to do to a witness after he testifies?

They're allowed to cross-examine him. The witness is called to the stand - and gives their account of what they saw. The opposing counsel then has the chance to question the witness - in an attempt to disprove their evidence.