Want this question answered?
they wore armour
you go into weapons and go to armour.
They weren't. A knight needed a horse that was not as heavy and could maneuver in battle. The knight's horse was trained to carry him knee to knee with the knight next to him. As if in a long line of armour. So, the horse was controlled with the legs and they were a special horse not for everyday riding. The suit of armour was about 45 pounds so not as heavy as it has been pictured ( today's army carries more weight) and it was an expensive item to own ( in today's standards the cost of armour was like the cost of a 5 bedroom house today).
it is mainly used in the army for the armour of tanks i hope this helps
killing, but the Greeks were better, they stole all their strategies and armour from the Greeks, killing, but the Greeks were better, they stole all their strategies and armour from the Greeks,
ARMY has more power than police always i support for indian army
there is no police rank equivalent to indian army captain!
Pakistan Army Corps of Military Police was created in 1947.
The Roman army was the most powerful one in Europe. The soldiers had swords armour and helmets with crests
The Roman army had three types of torso armour: the lorica hamata (mail armour), the lorica squamata (scale armour) or the lorica segmentata (plated armour). The original name of the lorica segmentata is not known. This name dates to the 16th century. It has been speculated that the original name may have been lorica laminata.
Roman soldiers wore helmet and armour and carried a shield.
general army is a higher position than general police as general police is two star rank whereas general army has five star rank.