answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

If you dont pass this test you wont go to collage

User Avatar

Marquise Curtis

Lvl 3
βˆ™ 3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

skrrrt skrrrt

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 3y ago
your dumb as my guy
User Avatar

aborji335

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 2y ago
Thank you
User Avatar

Felix Ortiz

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 1y ago
You cant even spell
More answers
User Avatar

Fresas con crema

Lvl 5
βˆ™ 3y ago

Our Basketball team is the best because we are so awesome. -apex

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Trace Wallace

Lvl 2
βˆ™ 3y ago

BB

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Marquise Curtis

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 3y ago
Wrong

User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 1w ago

"All politicians are dishonest, just like the one I met yesterday." This statement commits the logical fallacy of hasty generalization by making an unwarranted generalization about all politicians based on the characteristics of one individual.

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What type of logical fallacy is this statement an example of?

Without knowing the specific statement, it is difficult to identify the type of logical fallacy. Can you please provide the statement so I can assist you further?


Define Tautology and Fallacy?

A Tautology is any logical statement that always results in True. Example, the statement - "Malaria is dangerous" is always true.A Fallacy is a statement that always results in False. Example - "Toxic waste is easy to store" - is always falseThere are exactly opposite of each other.


This sentence contains an example of what type logical fallacy?

this man left his wife for another woman so we cant trust him


What type of logical fallacy is the statement Paul would make a great class president because he is good at basketball and example of?

The statement is an example of the logical fallacy known as "non sequitur," where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premise. Being good at basketball does not necessarily correlate with being a great class president, as the qualities needed for each role can be very different.


The passage from β€œthe damnation of a canyon” is an example of which logical fallacy?

Ad hominem


What passage from The Damnation of a Canyon is an example of which logical fallacy?

Ad hominem


What kind of logical fallacy does this passage contain Crime is out of control in this city I've spoken to two people in the last six months who had their houses burglarized we need more police?

The passage contains the logical fallacy of hasty generalization. The conclusion that more police are needed to control crime is based on a small sample size (two people) and may not accurately represent the overall crime situation in the city. More data and analysis are needed to make a valid argument for increasing police presence.


What type of logical fallacy is the following statement an example of Toyotas are some of the best-made cars in the world because they are so well constructed?

This statement exemplifies the logical fallacy known as circular reasoning, where the conclusion is restated in the premises or when the conclusion is assumed in the premises. The argument fails to provide evidence or logical reasons why Toyotas are the best-made cars besides simply stating they are well constructed.


What is the logical fallacy in the statement I think Ms Sawyer is the best history teacher at your school She is a lifelong member of the Republican Party?

Oversimplification


What is Ad hominem?

An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.


Which of these is an error in reasoning?

a logical fallacy


What is an example of a fallacy?

One example of a fallacy is the ad hominem fallacy, where an argument is attacked based on the person making it rather than the actual argument itself. This fallacy involves attacking the opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument, which is not a valid or logical way to engage in a debate or discussion.