The 2nd one
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "back to home." The correct phrase is "back home" or "back to the house."
The sentence is grammatically correct.
He wants somebody who can write a grammatically correct sentence.
No, it is not grammatically correct to say, 'revert back to'. You would simply say 'revert', as in 'Can we revert to the previous subject?' Revert means to go back (to something), so saying 'revert back to' is saying the same thing twice, which is called tautology.
We've got your back. Is this a correct statement?
To take back a statement means to retract or withdraw what was previously said. This can be done if the statement was incorrect, misleading, or no longer relevant. It is a way to clarify or correct any misunderstanding caused by the original statement.
The middle one is grammatically incorrect though often used in speech. 'We have your back' is formally correct. 'We've got your back is perfectly acceptable, though less formal.
The correct grammar for the statement would be "Please respond back to Mike and me." Use "me" instead of "I" because it is the object of the verb "respond" in this sentence.
Yes, the sentence 'How will you know if you passed it?' is grammatically correct. 'I'm pretty sure I passed my English exam.' 'How will you know if you passed it?' 'I'll find out when I go back to school on Monday.'
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "I retrospect." The correct phrase is "In retrospect," which means looking back on a past event or situation.
No, the correct phrase is "in retrospect." "In retrospect" means looking back on a past event or situation with understanding gained from later knowledge or experience.
Yes, "I am chilling with friends" is grammatically correct. "Chilling" is a colloquial term for relaxing or hanging out in a laid-back manner, so it is commonly used in informal conversations with friends.