It would be inaccurate to claim that Thomas Hobbes believed individuals in a state of nature lived a peaceful and harmonious existence, as he famously argued that such a state would be characterized by a constant state of war due to human nature. Similarly, it would be incorrect to attribute the belief to john Locke that property rights are absolute and unlimited, as he argued that property rights are only valid as long as they do not harm others or waste resources.
"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.
One statement that is not true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes is that they both believed that individuals had an innate right to rebel against unjust governments. In reality, while Locke argued that individuals had the right to rebel against governments that violated their natural rights, Hobbes did not advocate for rebellion and believed in a strong, centralized authority to prevent chaos and uphold social order.
John Locke argued that, just as it is impossible for a large planet to orbit around a small moon, so too was it impossible for the large American colonies to forever remain in the orbit of the small nation of Great Britain.
Both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke believed in the concept of a social contract as a means to establish civil society. However, Hobbes believed in a strong centralized government to maintain order and security, while Locke advocated for limited government power and individual rights.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.
(Apex) Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish and violent, while Locke did not.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
Enlightenment thinkers
Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
Hobbes supported absolute monarchy, while Locke supported the idea of popular sovereignty
Hobbes supported absolute monarchy, while Locke supported the idea of popular sovereignty
YES
The Enlightenment began in Western Europe, particularly in countries like England, France, and Germany. These nations saw a surge in scientific and philosophical advancements, challenging traditional beliefs and institutions. Key figures of the Enlightenment include Voltaire, Rousseau, and Locke.
There were three men who are historically linked to social contract theory. They are Thomas Hobbes, john Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Both Hobbes and Locke were Englishmen.
True. John Locke had more influence on the American Founders than did Thomas Hobbes. The Americans wanted nothing to do with Thomas Hobbes. The Americans did not want George III. The Americans did not seek Leviathan.