Near the end of the battle, many English had been killed and the remaining army were fearful of the powerful Scots. The fact that the small army of Scots were winning against their large army made them afraid, and although they still had a good chance of winning the battle, the English scattered. Some drowned, and others were killed by the Scots.
The were two battles of Falkirk, one in 1298 between Scottish forces and the English army, which was won by England and the other in 1746 which was a Jacobite victory over the Hanoverian British army.
So in conclusion neither of the battles was won by a Scottish force. The battle in 1746 had many Scots on both sides.
Wallace watched the English as they crossed the bridge & waited till just the right the moment, when there were sizable amount of English that had crossed the bridge.. He knew how many he could defeat..
they won it beause of the tacticsused by wallace, lure them onto the bridge then attack from the rear and front leaving them no where to go but in the water. short version
The Scottish army under the joint command of William Wallace and Andrew Moray.
Yes they did. And the battle took place on the 11th September 1297.
Because.
The Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
i think they won because they had high morale (often went into battle singing) the royalists were outnumbered and they had the element of surprise
The English thought their cavalry, armoured knights on horseback, would win the battle for them: How wrong can you be....
He was supposed to have seen a sign in the sky, showing the Christian cross and the words "in this sign you will conquer" or something like it. This was supposed to have made him congenial toward the Christians afterward.
Win a battle on union soil.
There was no Battle of Stirling. You may be thinking of the Battle of Stirling Bridge which the Scots won on the 11th September 1297 under the command of William Wallce.
The Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
11 September 1297.
The only battle Wallace won was the Battle of Stirling Bridge, 11th September 1297. The following year, at Falkirk, he lost and had to continue using guerrilla tactics until his betrayal in 1305.
Harald Hardrada did not win the Battle of Hastings, he was killed earlier at the Battle of Stamford Bridge.
Harold Godwineson won the battle of Stamford Bridge, and then William Duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings due to his leadership, preparation and luck.
i think they won because they had high morale (often went into battle singing) the royalists were outnumbered and they had the element of surprise
No, he wasn't there. Harold Godwinson won at Stanford Bridge against Harald Hardrada and Tostig Godwinson
Because otherwise Chealsea wouldn't be winning the league!
The English thought their cavalry, armoured knights on horseback, would win the battle for them: How wrong can you be....
To keep enemies in a little open so you can have the advantage and maybe win the war or battle
He was supposed to have seen a sign in the sky, showing the Christian cross and the words "in this sign you will conquer" or something like it. This was supposed to have made him congenial toward the Christians afterward.