They were surprised to find that milk came from cows and eggs were laid by hens.
Mostly the same as the rest of the population. Food was rationed and children had their own ration books. Some evacuee children were in the countryside and were able to have things like fresh eggs and vegetables that may not have been available to other people.
The children needed to be protected from dying in the bombing blitz. The Ministry of Health came up with a program to evacuate the children, some mothers, disabled and very old people to the countryside. The "evacuees" were sent to farms and other country homes. Many of the children loved seeing farms, farm animals and the countryside for the first time. Some suffered from home sickness. It did work. After the blitz was over they came home to their parents.
some scared, some suprised
Evacuation took place during the first months of World War Two. Evacuation was a potentially traumatic occurrence and the government tried to lessen its impact by issuing advice to all of those impacted by evacuation. This advice was delivered to what the government referred to as "evacuable" areas - the advice is clearly biased towards the government's viewpoint - that evacuation was for the best and pushed home hard the potential consequences of what might happen if children were not evacuated from danger areas.The evacuation of Britain's cities at the start of World War Two was the biggest and most concentrated mass movement of people in Britain's history. In the first four days of September 1939, nearly 3,000,000 people were transported from towns and cities in danger from enemy bombers to places of safety in the countryside.•Schoolchildren (827,000) and their teachers•Mothers with children under five (524,000)•Pregnant women (12,000)•Some disabled peopleWhere were the children taken to?The children were not evacuated to any city at all. They were evacuated to smaller towns and villages in the countryside. Some children were sent to stay with relatives outside in the countryside, but others were sent to live with complete strangers.
The government in the UK (not the women) decided that children should be evacuated from large cities, especially from London, and accommodated in smaller communities in the countryside. That was quite a culture shock for the children and for the homes in which they were accomodated. After some months, many of the children drifted home to the cities.
Yes, to places in the countryside. Some churches and schools maintained country retreats, where children were evacuated.
Some women went to the countryside ,similarly with their children, to work on farms. This was known as the women's land army.
countryside and grassy
west barnet and the countryside
Children would leave their homes and would be evacuated to somewhere safe like the countryside. Some of the mothers would be evacuated as well, some of them would even go to war to fight, but most of them stayed at their homes in the city, possibly facing their death. Children would go with their schools to the train stations and families from the countryside or any other safe area would come and choose the children they would like to come with them. The children would have to be well behaved and clean to get chosen.
Mostly the same as the rest of the population. Food was rationed and children had their own ration books. Some evacuee children were in the countryside and were able to have things like fresh eggs and vegetables that may not have been available to other people.
The children needed to be protected from dying in the bombing blitz. The Ministry of Health came up with a program to evacuate the children, some mothers, disabled and very old people to the countryside. The "evacuees" were sent to farms and other country homes. Many of the children loved seeing farms, farm animals and the countryside for the first time. Some suffered from home sickness. It did work. After the blitz was over they came home to their parents.
some people who live in that countryside or relitives of the person that has died
some scared, some suprised
Evacuation took place during the first months of World War Two. Evacuation was a potentially traumatic occurrence and the government tried to lessen its impact by issuing advice to all of those impacted by evacuation. This advice was delivered to what the government referred to as "evacuable" areas - the advice is clearly biased towards the government's viewpoint - that evacuation was for the best and pushed home hard the potential consequences of what might happen if children were not evacuated from danger areas.The evacuation of Britain's cities at the start of World War Two was the biggest and most concentrated mass movement of people in Britain's history. In the first four days of September 1939, nearly 3,000,000 people were transported from towns and cities in danger from enemy bombers to places of safety in the countryside.•Schoolchildren (827,000) and their teachers•Mothers with children under five (524,000)•Pregnant women (12,000)•Some disabled peopleWhere were the children taken to?The children were not evacuated to any city at all. They were evacuated to smaller towns and villages in the countryside. Some children were sent to stay with relatives outside in the countryside, but others were sent to live with complete strangers.
Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.
yes! and some of them are on-line too. you would be suprised how many school are out there