destroy the railroads.
They ran.
The South used basically the same tactics as the North. Allot of attacking and retreating in formations. Usually one side attacked a designated position on the other defended. The South did use guerrilla warfare, especially with Calvary, raiding Union supplies and food and skirmishing.
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
Mahandas Gandhi
Mobility, heavy weapons, terrain
The North.
The South's strategy during the Civil War was to get Great Britian's support. >The South's strategy was to use the great military leaders and commanders they had in order to defeat the North. With the North having multiple advantages, the South used their strongest factor: military training.
To use aerial bombardments to force the communists to quit their struggle against South Vietnam.
They fought with intelligence.
Why do I use tactics? Well, because tactics are better than brute force.
North Korea use North Korean won. South Korea use South Korean won.
Four of the "Northern" states permitted slavery. It was not common in the North, due to an absence of large farming operations. The South was mainly agriculture, North manufacturing- which did not use slaves that often.