Recuse
to prevent a tie when voting on a case
Chief Justice John Roberts.
The Chief Justice would not preside over the US Supreme Court if he (or she) recuses himself from a case; is sick or otherwise disabled; is engaged in a Presidential impeachment trial; or is on trial in the Senate himself. In the absence of the Chief Justice, the Senior Associate Justice (the justice who has served on the Supreme Court longest) would take responsibility for the Court.
Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall, in the US Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison, (1803).
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney lead the US Supreme Court in 1857, and presided over the Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857) case.
dissenting opinion
Cushing and Moore took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. ... The case resulted from a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury, who ... the Supreme Court to force the new Secretary of State James Madison to deliver.
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.
Absolutely not; that would be a conflict of interest and a breach of ethics that would not be permitted by the courts. If the case ever reached the US Supreme Court on appeal, and the the justice was, for some reason, still a member of the Court, he (or she) would be expected to recuse himself from participating in the case.
Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that established the precedent of judicial review. John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the court.
In Re Gault, 387 US 1 (1967)In Re Gault, (1967) is the landmark Supreme Court case that determined juvenile offenders had the same Due Process rights as adults.The Chief Justice in Gault was Earl Warren (1953-1969). Justice Abe Fortas wrote the opinion of the Court.
You may be asking who creates the docket, or schedule of oral arguments, for the US Supreme Court. This is handled by the Supreme Court Clerk of Court, with input from the Chief Justice once the Court grants certiorari (agrees to review) a case. The Clerk of Court handles administrative details related to organizing and processing cases.If you're referring to a case conference or meeting agenda, those are set by the Chief Justice.