0
Bicameral means divided into 2 branches or chambers.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the definetion of a peninsala?
A land mass surrounded by water on three sides
What is definetion of matter wave?
they are also called de brogle waves.they are the waves associated with particles.
What is the partie system?
Bicameral
How many countries have bicameral legislature?
maldives uk america
What are some good ideas for laws?
A homeless man pushes an old shopping cart past several people waiting at a bus stop and his odor is so wretched, so olfactory offensive that several people at the bus stop and gag reflexively. Many people are obviously upset and offended by the homeless mans odor. An older gentleman sitting on the bench at the bus stop shakes his head an grumbles to no one in particular; "There ought to be a law." Several boys are playing with their skateboards on a public sidewalk, laughing and taking preposterous risks upon their skate boards and a newlywed couple with their first born child try to move past the boys, who oblivious to the couple and their baby keep skateboarding, nearly colliding with the baby carriage. The newlywed husband and father shakes his fist angrily at the rambunctious boys and screams; "There ought to be a law." A dog barks incessantly and the little old lady that lives in the house next door isn't able to hear what the question was that Alex Trebec asked the contestants on Jeopardy and she mutters sadly; "There ought to be a law." Imagine if the laws of mathematics and science were viewed the same way that the laws of justice are viewed. Imagine that gravity did not even exist until Sir Isaac Newton thought of it. That the speed of light traveled much slower until a law was written and now the speed of light travels faster. Imagine what life must have been like before Planks law of constants. Imagine that the universe is a smoothly operating system because physicist and mathematicians wrote laws forcing the universe to comply. Imagine that the sun once revolved around the Earth as did all other planetary bodies until Copernicus and Galileo overturned that law and ruled that the Earth like all other solar planets revolve around the sun. Once the sun was subject to Earths planetary pull, now Earth subject to the sun because of a scientific ruling that someday, may or may not, be overturned. Just imagine... Now...imagine that all legislative bodies, all judicial branches, spent their time and effort in discovering the laws of justice rather than making up laws that are politically expedient. Imagine that! What are good ideas for laws? Perhaps those laws that all ready exist are the best laws to go with. The crime of murder did not become a crime because people wrote a law making it so. Murder is a crime because it violates a natural law and if that law is broken, the consequences are as dire as breaking the laws of gravity. Stealing from other people violates a natural law as does rape, assault, fraud, and as the complexities of civilization continue to grow, no doubt there are laws not yet discovered that will be brought to light. These laws do not prevent people from breaking the law, they are there to help us put justice in. When someone breaks the law, there is an absence of justice and it is necessary to put that justice back in...to maintain a proper balance. When justice is not put in lawlessness prevails. When justice is present, law and order prevails. This has been a law discovered since time immemorial. When the people view the law as the means by which justice is put in, then the laws of the land are simple and few. When the people view the law as the means by which majorities, minorities, special interest groups and clever individuals can claim entitlement and plunder all there is to plunder, there is no justice only plunder and lawlessness. The bad idea of laws that seem like a good idea is that they are created to appease, to prevent to ignore the natural order of things and change that order in full expectation that order will prevail. The bad idea of laws that seem like a good idea is that the laws only create more problems than they solve, never fulfilling their purpose, they do not prevent, nor appease, nor change the social order and so more laws are written to amend the old ones to correct the error and bureaucracies built in a vain attempt to appease, prevent and change the social order. When we view the law as a means by which to regulate the behavior of people we create statutes and regulations, ordinances and rules that demand agencies and departments in order to oversee, enforce and try these statutes, regulations, ordinances and rules and in the end make criminals out of people with aberrant behavior in an arrogant effort to prevent lawlessness. The more statutes, regulations, rules and ordinances that intrude upon the freedoms of the people, the more the people will come to suspect that the law is suppressive and quite naturally rebel and lawlessness will prevail...does prevail. What are good ideas for laws? The best idea for a law is one that prohibits the government from creating new laws and confines them to the tedious and arduous task of discovering laws. A law that insists the same method used in testing scientific theories be used in testing legal theories. That a theory not proven is not a law but just another unproven theory and that a theorem proven is no longer theory but now is law. This law may not prevent governments from attempting to expand the scope of their jurisdiction but when they do go too far and intrude into the lives of the people, the people then have a law to guide them so they may put justice in. Imagine a law like that. There is, of course, a law like that and it can be found in the Constitution of the United States of America. In this legal document, the government is prohibited from abrogating or derogating the natural rights of people. The legislative process is weighted down like heavy chains with a bicameral legislative body that is required to pass certain tests before any legislation is passed. Before being accepted as law that legislation must then be signed into law by the President of the United States. If the President vetoes the law, Congress has another chance to enact that law. Once passed the people may at any time challenge the validity of law and the courts must hear their case and allow for a redress of grievances. This process of testing legal theory has been diluted by crafty legislation and the passing of certain amendments that hoped to change the republic established with in the Constitution into a more democratic government. This dilution has led to a proliferation of legislation and the growth of many administrative agencies that have come to believe they exist outside the confines of the Constitution. Agencies such as the I.R.S. create their own legal system complete with their own "tax court", where due process of law is rejected and everyone is guilty until proven innocent. There is F.E.M.A. that believes it can conscript people into service when an emergency has been declared, and further believes to be outside the confines of the Constitution because in the time of an emergency it is their belief the Constitution will be suspended in favor of martial law. There is Homeland Security that believes it can ignore the Constitution simply by labeling someone an "enemy combatant". There is the F.B.I., the A.T.F. and the D.E.A., all of which employ undercover agents who willingly and willfully break the law in order to "uphold the law" and then there is the D.M.V., a traffic regulatory agency that has the audacity to declare driving a privilege and not a right. As if an administrative agency had the legal authority to declare what rights the people have and don't have. All of this comes from government looking for good ideas for laws. The Constitution prohibits much of what these administrative agencies do and they will continue to do so and intrude even further until the people have had enough and put a stop to it. Thus far, the people seem to prefer this "more democratic" form of government over the republic that amazingly still stands. Will justice prevail or will the United States crumble into the land of lawlessness? It is entirely up to the people.
What is definetion of epi?
above
What is the definetion for the European?
From Europe.
Definetion E in Generosity?
elligible
What is the fullform of 3D?
3rd definetion
What is the definetion of focus?
it is to listen and you better do that or else
Does Illinois have a bicameral or unicameral legislative branch?
bicameral
What is the definetion of kewlio?
Kewlio- cool; hip; awsome
What Is the Definetion of depth?
The measure of anything downward or inward
What is annuity definetion?
go to dictionary.com it is a fantastic website.
What is the definetion of core?
The inner layer of Earth's Crust.
Is the legislature of Pennsylvania bicameral or unicameral?
its bicameral, which means "2 houses". we have the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Is assam a bicameral or unicameral?
bicameral
