That depends on the financial state of the husband and of whatever assets the two of you own. If, for example, your husband was unemployed or a student, you likely wouldn't receive alimony. There can also be the case if the couple has children. In that case, whomever takes the kids would receive child support by the spouse. However, this support may also vary according to the financial state of the spouse.
In the case of houses, if you have children and are the legal guardian then you can claim the house for the kids. Otherwise it would likely be split between the two of you. It really all comes down to the financial state of the husband, whether or not you have kids and who will take them, and of course, how competent your lawyer is and whether or not your husband will agree to your terms.
According to the Alabama Code (1975): Section 30-2-11 Wife may be enjoined from use of given name or initials of divorced husband. After divorce from the bonds of matrimony and within the discretion of the circuit court of the county in which the divorced wife resides and upon application of any interested party, the divorced wife may be enjoined from the use of the given name or initials of the divorced husband. Enjoined means "prohibited." So at least in the State of Alabama, it's possible, although it's not done very often.
Yes, that would be appropriate.
I think this is totally up to you. Would the potential guest know you if you used your maiden name? Or you could use both names, hyphenated, so people know who is asking them to the party. for example: MARTHA JONES-SMITH In the old Etiquette books a divorced woman who has retained her ex-husband's last name, should use her own given name. If she has reverted to her maiden name then she may use it, with her full given name or just the initial. Examples: Married - Mrs John Smith Divorced - Mrs Mary Smith or Ms Mary Jones. For a party, unless it is very formal, or the divorce is recent you do not have to be as exact.
Confront her seriously and also your ex-husband. Tell them she is not her legal guardian because you have not given the authority and custody to her. If necessary you should get advice from court, that should soften her up.
If the account is a sole account and not connected to any joint account the husband should not be given any information whatsoever. If the bank supplies any information you should make a complaint to the legal department and change banks.
Hopefully, You were not maried when the loan was given, You should see an attorney.
Actually, they were not married on the date given.
is the spouse has given promission in writen form
He sure will. Unless you have signed a pre-nup.
If your husband is his sister's guardian and has given you permission to do so then you can, but it is better for him to be the one in charge.
No he could have bought spices and other things
No he could have bought spices and other things