Want this question answered?
And the queston is . . .
The International Criminal Court deals with cases of genocide or crimes against humanity. This Criminal Court which came into being on July 1, 2002, also hears cases of war crimes.
Hazel Cameron has written: 'Britain's hidden role in the Rwandan genocide' -- subject(s): Genocide, Genocide intervention, Responsibility to protect (International law), Principals (Criminal law), Prevention
established an international war-crimes tribunal
thr additional protocols to the geneva conventions
International Association of Genocide Scholars was created in 1994.
International Network of Genocide Scholars was created in 2005.
The international criminal court is responsible for trying those charged with war crimes, genocide, and human rights violations. The international criminal courts main advantage is having to adhere by UN policies and fairness in the prosecution of these cases.
Acording to Ä°nternational law it is not a genocide. There is no an international court decision that is rules the 1915 events as a genocide but politicians and some historians. (There are some other historians and politicians which are doesnt agree with them)
The Nuremberg Trials held after World War II established a precedent for prosecuting individuals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. They helped bring justice to those responsible for the atrocities committed during the war and set the stage for the development of international criminal law.
Yes. Failed attempts at genocide are still criminal acts.
Leaders directly are: The Janjaweed militia, supported by Sudanese Government. In 2003 Umar Al Bashir was the President of Sudan. He was charged for supporting killing by the International Criminal Tribunal in the Hague