Harilal J. Kania is the correct

SEPTEMBER 13, 2011

It is highly commendable that Janab Nisar Ahmad Kakru, Hon. Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court, Hyderabad made a clarion call to the Hon. Judges after unfurling the National Flag on 65th Independence Day at A.P. High Court to further speed up the process of hearing cases to ensure that justice is delivered with all the speed at their command. In this context, I would like to bring to the kind notice of the Hon. Chief Justice that one of the prime reasons for the procrastination in the dispensation of justice with a flickering hope that this issue will be given all the importance it deserves and the Chief Justice will take a serious notice of this for immediate remedial action. My own bitter experience narrated hereunder in greater detail about the inherent defect in the existing system which is mainly responsible for the abnormal delays occurring in the disposal of cases in the High Court .

I am 72 years old, a chronic diabetic having undergone heart surgery in Delhi in 2003. I have filed a Writ Petition No.30687 / 10 in A.P. High Court as a Party-in-Person. In the lower court, it has taken more than eight years for the disposal of the case for the acquittal of the vendor of the charge of selling Govt. assigned land. Hon. Justice Shri Nooti Ramamohana Rao was also convinced with my pleadings that my house site admeasuring 208 sq.yd was not a Govt. assigned land when it was purchased and duly Registered by the Sub-Registrar (East), Hyderabad in December, 1984 as the MRO has informed the Sub-Registar that it was Govt. assigned land after a long gap of 7 years in August, 1991. The District Registrar has stated in his sworn Affidavit that even the basic registers maintained in the year 1985 also showed that it was wet land and not a Govt. land. However, it has been acquired by the A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Ltd in 2007 without issuing even a mandatory notice to the purchaser. If the State itself becomes a "predator", to whom else the aggrieved can approach for the redress of his grievance except the High Court? The Counsel for A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corpn Ltd; Shri J. Prabhakar under the aforesaid circumstances has ultimately agreed in the open court during the 'final hearing' for the restoration of the site to me as it is still lying vacant as the Corpn. did not have plans to take up construction there. Whereupon, the Hon. Justice in the open court directed me and Shri Mallesh, Tahsildar of A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corpn Ltd on 15-7-11 to locate my plot with the help of MRO; Hayathnagar and after marking the boundaries compliance to be reported back to him. Accordingly, his instructions were carried out and informed the same to the Hon. Judge when the case came up for next hearing on 22-7-11.

When the case has almost reached an end with only the judgment is to be delivered, it has been suddenly transferred to another Court No.23 presided by Hon. Justice Shri Ramesh Ranganathan as per the strict procedure in vogue i.e rotation of cases at every two months interval with the case back to square one. Although the case has been listed in his Court for "final hearing" again on 08-8-11, 16-8-11, 17-8-11, 19-8-11 and 26-8-11 he had expressed his inability to take it up as he curtly told that he is overburdened with 1400 admission cases and can't spare his time for "final hearing" cases despite repeated appeals..

It may therefore be seen from the above sequential events that the decision arrived at by the previous Hon. Judge has already been set in motion and when the judgment is awaited, the case has been shifted to my rude shock to another Judge to be heard by him afresh. In the intervening period of 8 months, four Judges have handled this case with no end in sight. To my misfortune, I am being tossed from one bench/court to the other like a shuttlecock. This is one of the real factors for piling-up of cases in the High Court as the entire exercise goes on and on without giving a chance to the judges to arrive at a logical conclusion.

To remedy the present ailing system, it is strongly felt that a brief report on the stage of the case is to be obtained from Judges and cases at the final stage retained with the same judge as he is fully conversant with the case instead of transferring the cases purely as a mechanical adherence to the so called "Rule Book" and adopt a pragmatic approach..

S.S.Rao,M.Sc.(Ag.)GoldMedallist

e-mail:-samsrirao@rediff.com 09390397505(M)

Jodimetla Village, Warangal Highway

Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

Andhra Pradesh, Pin Code:-500088

9390397505

Leave a Comment

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Titan by The Theme Foundry.

It decides, in accordance with international law, disputes of a legal nature that are submitted to it by States (jurisdiction in contentious cases)

rules on international disputes A+

Indian Courts Hierarchy can be broadly categorized into Civil Court and Criminal Court

In civil courts every suit should be instituted before the court of lowest jurisdiction. In the civil side the Munsif's Court is the court of lowest jurisdiction. If the value of the subject matter of the suit is worth rupees one lakh or below, the Munsiff's Court is the competent court to try the suit. If the value exceeds above rupees one lakh the suit should be filed before the Subordinate Judge's Court

(Sub Court). An appeal from the decisions of the Munsiff is filed before the District Court. Appeals from the decisions of the Sub Court is filed before the District Court if the subject matter of the suit is of value up to rupees two lakhs. If the value is above two lakhs, the appeal should be filed before the High Court and next to the Supreme Court.

Administration of criminal justice is carried out through Magistrate- Courts and Sessions courts. The hierarchy of criminal courts is given below. The Court at the lowest level is called Judicial Magistrate of the second class. This Court is competent to try the case if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or with fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or with both. The First Class Magistrate is competent to try offences punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or with fine upto ten thousand rupees. In the State of Kerala, the second and the First Class Magistrate Courts have been unified. The Chief Judicial Magistrate can impose any fine and punishment up to seven years imprisonment.

The Assistant Sessions Judge is competent to impose punishments up to ten years

imprisonment and any fine. The Sessions Judge can impose any punishment authorized by law; but the sentence of death passed by him should be subject to the confirmation by the High Court. (see for details Sections 28 and 29 of Criminal Procedure Code.)

About High Court

High Court stands at the head of a State's judicial administration. It has power to issue to any person within its jurisdiction writs, orders or directions. Writs are in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and for any other purpose. Each High Court has powers of superintendence over all Courts and Tribunals within its jurisdiction.

About Supreme Court

The Supreme Court the highest court in the country. It has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction. Its exclusive original jurisdiction extends to Central-State and inter State disputes. In addition, Article 32 of the Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It is empowered to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari to enforce them.. The Supreme Court, if satisfied that cases involving substantially the same questions of law of general importance are pending before it and the High Courts, it may withdraw such case and dispose them by itself.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia

Chief Justice of India

Appointed as the Chief Justice of India in the forenoon of 12.05.2010

KG. Balakrishnan

has retired , the current CJI is Justice S. H. Kapadia
The present CJI is Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar and is the 44th CJI since January 1950, the year the constitution came into effect and the supreme court came into being. He succeeded Justice T.S. Thakur on 4 January 2017 and will remain in office till 28 August 2017, the day he completes 65 years of age.