Honorable Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry
Judge, Supreme Court of Pakistan
Constitutional Avenue, Islamabad
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
It is situated in Islamabad.The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression (although it cannot currently and will in no way before 2017[2] be able to exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression).[3][4]
The legislation that those two bodies deal with is difference. THe ECHR deals with the convention on Human Rights and the ECJ deals with EU legislation
The Supreme Court is the highest power court in any country. This court may contain a bench of any number of judges and this bench is lead by one judge of all....that is the Chief Justice. In Pakistan there is a Bench of 15 lead by 1. These judges are supposed to solve the matters upon country level, they can take personal notice to any matter which could involve an individual. Most of the times chief justice puts them to make decisions together& he leads them. Matters of national interest could also be taken to notice by these judges.
The international criminal court is responsible for trying those charged with war crimes, genocide, and human rights violations. The international criminal courts main advantage is having to adhere by UN policies and fairness in the prosecution of these cases.
The Hon'ble Sir Harilal Jekisundas Kania, First Chief Justice of Free India -14 Aug. 1947-5 Nov. 1951; Judge High Court, Bombay. 1933-46, acting Chief Justice in 1944 and 1945; Judge; Federal Court 20 June 1946-13 Aug. 1947. Retired on 6.11.1951.
The Hague, Netherlands. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice
Judges or justices.
It depends on which court you are talking about.
Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110 001 (India)
e-mail at : supremecourt@nic.in The website of Supreme Court is www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in
New Delhi.
a person has to be a citizen of India,a high court advocate with atleast 10 years experience,or a judicial officer with at least 10 years experience
Probably not enough.
ANS#2:
Rs.1,00,000/- per month
The fact of the matter is that the ICJ cannot actually ensure state compliance. The ICJ simply determines whether or not any violation of a treaty between two or more nation states has been violated. The ICJ does not have any means of enforcing the law. In fact, international law is enforced primarily by the Security Council.
One of the least effective things in world history in supporting world peace was the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928. Signed by Germany, the United States, and France, it did virtually nothing for the advent of world peace.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights was created on 1979-05-22.
DIVERGENT VIEWS
Answer
Yes. A Supreme Court Justice is placed in office for life and no one can hold them accountable for the decisions they make. We have term limitations in the Executive Branch. Legislative branch members must be re-elected but the Supreme Court Judges are there for life.
Answer
Whether the Supreme Court is too powerful is always been a hot topic. However, take into consideration that the Court's job is to first and foremost interpret the constitution. If, as the person above suggests, we elect Justices, the interpretation of the constitution would become too political. The founders wanted to safeguard the Constitution and put in Justices for life terms.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court really only has power to the extent that the other 2 branches of government abide by its rulings. After all, the Supreme Court doesn't have an army or police force with which it can enforce its rulings. Of course, if Congress or the executive branch decided to flout a Supreme Court ruling, they would basically be saying that the constitution has become irrelevant, and then we'd have far bigger problems than an academic debate over the extent of the Supreme Court's power.
Answer
No.
It does the job it is set up to do, and that job only. The only way you could possibly decrease the power it has is by creating a further court above it. But the same thing happens: a higher court will always have more power than the lower court, so you could only shift the power to a different place, never take it away.
Moreover, that would lower the impact of justice, since someone could always appeal the decision regardless of how many courts had agreed on the verdict.
The United States basically doesn't want to fall under the same jurisdiction of everyone else. http://www.fpif.org/articles/us_vs_icc
The Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is annexed to the Charter of the United Nations. It serves to organize the composition and function of the Court.
Fifteen judges sit in the international court of justice.