Well, creation is the most evidently accused matter, for scientists do not wish to admit that 1. they are wrong 2. there is a being stronger and better than man kind, and 3. if they control our beliefs they also can control, to a certain extent, what we do. Another subject challenged is if Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit can be one but three different people at the same time. This is questioned simply because the human mind cannot comprehend what the mind of God can. It is also questioned if The Bible was really written by God, this is because scientists and others are striving to find flaws and must do so just to prove the Bible and its teachings wrong. There are a lot more, too, so if you still have questions you might want to Google it.
First responder makes some good points.However, as a Catholic, I have no problem holding a creationism belief simultaneously with evolutions of the species by natural selection as part of God's plan. In other matters of Faith versus science, I say those who have faith need no explanation, and for those who don't, no explanation will suffice. Everyone has free will to believe as they choose . Those of us who have faith do not struggle with these other issues. Scientists and scholars can argue til they're blue. I just enjoy the gifts we have been given.
These writings challenged traditional social, religious, and political values.
In the context of Germany in the World War II era, traditional leaders were in fact being challenged -- by the Nazis -- in several different respects. First, the traditional Western leaders of Europe, Great Britain and France, were being directly challenged. Second, within Germany, the traditional military leadership was challenged both directly and indirectly. Finally, and also within Germany, the traditional social leadership of parents, pastors, and local politicians was systematically (if often subtly) challenged by the Nazis in many different ways.
W.E.B. DuBois
W.E.B. DuBois
W.E.B. DuBois
•The Darwinian revolution challenged traditional views of a young Earth inhabited by unchanging species •In order to understand why Darwin's ideas were revolutionary -We need to examine his views in the context of other Western ideas about Earth and its life
both challenged traditional beliefs and emphasized the importance of reason, empirical evidence, and the scientific method in understanding the natural world.
The "new morality" was a set of ideas of groups that wanted to restrict immigration and preserve, what they considered "traditional values." New Morality challenged traditional ways of seeing and thinking, it glorified youth and personal freedom and influenced various aspects of Americain society.
You cannot really say that Marcello Malpighi challenged ideas. The work that he did was ground breaking, so there was really no preformed ideas.
Monarchs censored Enlightenment writers because the ideas promoted by these writers often challenged the traditional authority of the monarchy and the Church. Monarchs saw these ideas as a threat to their power and control over society. Censorship was a way for them to maintain their authority and suppress dissenting views.
the church
the church