The Sahel and savannah can support herds of animals for grazing.
Pampas.
Pampas.
Horses are required to supervise, move, and round up the cattle in the vast grazing areas.
It depends on where the cattle farming is taking place. Some areas where people have little ideas of how to properly graze their cattle, the erosion in those areas is high. But in areas where farmers and ranchers are maintaining good to great grazing practices, there is little to no soil erosion happening.
Cattle Ranching - Apex -Just took the test-
in modern areas,business in rural ,farming,fishing,cattle grazing etc
Well the biggest threat is people consuming the wilderness for homes and strip malls. Also the cattle ranchers threaten the mustang by saying they overgraze the land that they feed their privately owned cattle on. The cattle vastly outnumber the horses and strip the land faster, leaving little for the horse to live on. Another Answer: Uncontrolled, continuous grazing by cattle which encourages overgrazing in many areas of the federally-owned public lands where numerous ranchers (not all, though) set their cattle to graze in the summer months is possibly what may threaten the survival of the wild mustangs of the Southwestern US. However, such grazing also threatens the well-being of the cattle, as they do not have as many areas to graze as they should have when they were first shipped to graze on such public lands. However, there have been various anecdotal evidence of horses and burros not even having their grazing land and watering holes in the same vicinity as that of cattle. The fact that they're threatened by decreased grazing land available some have shown to be untrue, as well as claims that many of the wild horses were found to be thin and emaciated. The BLM is responsible for maintaining horse populations to ensure the competition for food and water does not get out of hand. However, the topic of wild horses and their "direct" conflict/competition with cattle for grazing space is an on-going debate and there really is no right nor wrong answer.
spain
midland areas
mapungubwe
They lived along the river Nile, because the areas directly bordereing the Nile were (and still are) the only fertile areas where crops can grow and cattle can graze.
Yes, definitely. Grazing cattle is very sensible because it requires much less fuel and machinery time to harvest the forage and deposit manure on the land than it would to harvest the forage and then spread the manure on the pasture.Cattle are very useful for consuming forage in areas where it's impractical to use machinery for getting the job done. These range from native rangelands to crop fields with crop down that are too soft to be able to get large machinery in to get the crop off. Cattle also deposit manure on the lands that need it, and they'll literally transport seeds (legumes especially, and even undesirable weed seeds) from one pasture to another.As large grazing herbivores, cattle, especially if managed properly, provide the necessary hoof action, and defoliation that plants need to grow and be productive. Proper grazing practices promote good soil health, biodiversity, increase in organic matter, etc. But proper grazing practices mean knowing timing of how long to graze and how long to let the plants to rest before next grazing. It also means knowing how much grass you have in your pasture in terms of pounds of forage per acre, in order to understand the stocking rate (as in animal unit days or months per acre) of your pasture.You can't have sensible grazing practices in order to make grazing cattle sensible.