0
What action can Congress take to nullify a US Supreme Court ruling that a federal law is unconstituitonal?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Answer
Constitutionally, there is nothing Congress can do to nullify a US Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court is an independent branch of the government, and the final authority on interpretation of law. The Supreme Court may nullify properly challenged legislation as a check on Congress, but the process doesn't work in reverse, with the Legislative branch nullifying Judicial decisions. If it did, the two branches of government would be deadlocked most of the time.
In practical terms, the two actions Congress and the President can take to circumvent a Supreme Court ruling is rewriting the legislation without the unconstitutional provisions; or ignoring the Court's decision altogether. Although they're not supposed to do this, there are plenty of historical examples where the Legislative and Executive branches abrogated the power of the Court and proceeded in opposition to a decision. One important, early example involved John Marshall and his series of ignored opinions concerning the Cherokee, as exemplified by Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832).
Answer
Congress can pass a new law in place of the law struck down by the court; a constitutional amendment would only be necessary when the court addressed point of law was directly related to constitutional issues, i.e., the Bill of Rights, or the Articles.
In the article, for The American Prospect, "Overruling the Court," Leon Friedman wrote:
"In 1982, for example, Congress amended the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to overrule a narrow Supreme Court holding in Mobile v. Bolden, a 1980 decision that addressed whether intentional discrimination must be shown before the act could be invoked. In 1988, Congress overruled another Supreme Court decision (in the 1984 case Grove City College v. Bell) by passing the Civil Rights Restoration Act, which broadened the coverage of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The legislative history of that law specifically recited that "certain aspects of recent decisions and opinions of the Supreme Court have unduly narrowed or cast doubt upon" a number of federal civil rights statutes and that "legislative action is necessary to restore the prior consistent and long-standing executive branch interpretations" of those laws."
Answer
They can propose a constitutional amendment.
To read the article in its entirety, see Related Links, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoCongress has no authority over the Supreme Court. The US Constitution dictates that they are separate entities. The Supreme Court, however, does have the authority to find laws passed by congress to be unconstitutional and can overturn laws when this is the case. This is extremely rare but the law does provide for it and it has happened in the past.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe Supreme Court has limited powers over the states. The Courts can decide that the state law or action conflicts with a federal law. They would have to have a judicial review
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are state supreme courts the only courts that can nullify state laws?
No. The US Supreme Court can nullify a challenged state law if it conflicts with the federal Constitution.
Who can nullify an Act of Congress?
The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.
Who has the authority to decide if the president's actions exceed the the powers of the executive branch?
supreme court
Could a state nullify a law?
A state's legislature can nullify its own laws. A state cannot nullify a federal law, as the Constitution shall be "the supreme law of the land".
Can congressional nullification overturn the ruling of the supreme court?
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
Why is it important that the Supreme Court can only deal with federal law and constitution?
The US Supreme Court can nullify state laws that conflict with the federal constitution. While the Court has jurisdictional limitations, they are not accurately described by the question.
What did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions argue?
States could nullify federal laws. That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws PLATOO against a loose interpretation of the constitution
Can a US Court of Appeals invalidate an act of congress?
No, they can render an opinion as to it beng unconstitutional but they have no power to invalidate the law. They must forward it to the Supreme Court for their review and judgement. Only the Supreme Court can nullify the law and invalidate an Act of Congress.
Who has the ability to veto unsatisfactory bills from congress?
President or Supreme Court can find it unconstitutional.
How was nullification a threat to the union?
In the Constitution, it states that Federal law was supreme over State law. Therefore, the power for a state to nullify a federal law would go against the Constitution.
Do federal courts have the right to nullify laws?
Any court can declare a law unconstitutional, but the government would appeal the decision to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate arbiter of constitutionality. Due to the appeals process, only the Supreme Court nullifies federal (and sometimes state) laws.
Which act did the US Supreme Court declare wholly or partly unconstitutional?
The US Supreme Court has declared hundreds of state and federal acts unconstitutional under the power of judicial review.The first time the Supreme Court exercised judicial review to nullify federal law was in 1803 when Chief Justice John Marshall declared Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789unconstitutional because he believed Congress had extended the Supreme Court's authority to issue writs of mandamus under its original jurisdiction (the first court to review a case) to federal officials, in contradiction to language in Article III of the Constitution.
