I think it is covalent
Iron would form ionic bonds with sulfur.
FeBr3 is an ionic bond, as it forms between a metal (Fe) and a nonmetal (Br) resulting in the transfer of electrons from Fe to Br.
Fe 2+andSO4 2-form the ionic bond,Ferrous sulfate, FeSO4, also know as iron II sulfate.
FeO is an ionic bond. Iron (Fe) is a metal and oxygen (O) is a non-metal, so they tend to form an ionic bond where Fe loses electrons to form Fe2+ cation and O gains electrons to form O2- anion.
FeOH is a covalent bond. This compound is composed of iron (Fe) and hydroxide (OH) ions, which are held together by sharing electrons. Covalent bonds form between nonmetal atoms or between a metal and a nonmetal in certain cases, such as in the hydroxide ion.
Iron would form ionic bonds with sulfur.
Fe 2+andSO4 2-form the ionic bond,Ferrous sulfate, FeSO4, also know as iron II sulfate.
Metals have metallic bonds.
FeCl3 Ionic Fe(3+) and three Cl(-)
FeOH is a covalent bond. This compound is composed of iron (Fe) and hydroxide (OH) ions, which are held together by sharing electrons. Covalent bonds form between nonmetal atoms or between a metal and a nonmetal in certain cases, such as in the hydroxide ion.
non polar
The bonding in FeCl (Iron(II) chloride) is primarily ionic, with the iron ion (Fe2+) positively charged and the chloride ion (Cl-) negatively charged, leading to electrostatic attraction between them. This results in the formation of a crystalline lattice structure in the solid state.
According to theory it has ionic bonding because a metal bonds with a non-metal. However, because there is not a large difference in electronegativity a bond is formed that is not exactly ionic nor covalent but an intermediate (the difference needs to be higher than 1.8 for an ionic bond to form, Fe has 1.8, O has 3.4 -> 1.6 difference). What this actually means is that Fe does not completely give away its three electrons to become Fe+3 because Oxygen doesn't attract them strong enough, or because Fe attracts them strongly too. Instead, they share the electrons as in a covalent bond. The bond is definitely polar (to give you an idea, the electronegativity difference between hydrogen and oxygen in water is 1.2, H has 2.2 and oxygen again 3.4. This gives rise to Hydrogen bonding, which is due to the polarity of the water molecule.). To conclude, the bond is an intermediate between an ionic and a covalent bond, and it is definitely polar.
Beryllium would most likely form an ionic bond with bromine (Br) since beryllium typically loses its two valence electrons to form a 2+ cation, while bromine tends to gain one electron to form a 1- anion. This charge transfer allows for the formation of an ionic bond between beryllium and bromine.
Iron is a metal and chlorine is a non-metal, so it would be classified as an ionic bond. However, the bond will actually possess some strong polar covalent character, because the electronegativity difference between Fe and Cl is approximately 1.2.
Yes, iron III nitrate is an ionic compound. It consists of the iron(III) cation (Fe^3+) and the nitrate anion (NO3^-), both of which are charged species that form an ionic bond between them.
Ag