anticipatory breach
Yes
Not every breach allows a contract to be cancelled. It has to be a material breach.
When one party to a contract does not perform his duties they are in breach of contract and there are legal implications. Each party to a contract makes a promise to either perform a certain duty or pay a certain amount. If one party fails to act as promised, and the other party has fulfilled the duties under the contract, the other party is entitled to legal relief. When one party has breached the contract, the party who has performed is entitled to various remedies for the breach. * Consequential damages - This requires the breaching party to pay the non-breaching party an amount that puts the non-breaching party in the same position they would have been in if the contract was performed * Punitive damages - Courts can force the breaching party to make a payment as a punishment for the breach of contract * Liquidated damages - The parties agree, at the time they make the contract, that if one party breaches the contract, the breaching party should pay a specified sum. Thus, this is an amount written in the contract * Nominal damages - This is a minimal amount provided to the non-breaching party if that party won the case but did not financially lose much In certain situations, they can also get specific performance of the contract.
The measure of damages in a claim for breach of contract is that sum that would place the Plaintiff (the aggrieved party) in the same position as he/she/it would have been had the contract been performed by the breaching party. This is most frequently meaured in terms of money, but under certain circumstances, the remedy for breach may be "specific performance"--in other words, getting the court to order the breaching party to actually do that which he/she/it promised to do.
Unjust enrichment is when a party wrongfully profits from a breach in contract. The contractual remedy is restitution during which the innocent party will receive the damages of the contract along with the unjust enrichments of the breaching party.
Contract law monitors the arrangement (offer and acceptance) between the parties. Any breach by either party gives the other party a right to seek for performance/damages/compensation, etc from the breaching party.
Normally, compensatory damages are measured by the party's expectancy, or what the parties should have reasonably foreseen as flowing from the breach. Parties may also receive reliance damages for the expenses caused by relying on the breached contract or restitution damages for the expense of assets conferred on the breaching party.
No.
Signing two contracts regarding the same matter is fraudulent behavior, at the very least, on the part of the person who signed them both. Breaching a contract is failing to live up to the terms stated in the contract and the punishment for breach is generally stated in the contract. Whether or not a breach of contract has occurred is uncertain without seeing the documents in question. Fraudulent behavior is a crime, however, and the punishment will be decided by the laws of your state.
No. Most contracts have some kind of remedy for breaches built into them, but, if yours does not, you still have to show how the breach caused you a financial loss (damages). Without a remedy in the contract itself, your chance at receiving damages is pretty small.
If the impossibility was unforeseeable, most courts treat it as if the contract never existed in the first place. If there is partial performance, the non-breaching party can recover damages only to the extent that they provided value to the breaching party. Impossibility would eliminate the non-breaching party's election of rescission or reformation.
You would be in breach of the contract and the other party to the contract would have cause to sue you. It would get more expensive for you in the end.You would be in breach of the contract and the other party to the contract would have cause to sue you. It would get more expensive for you in the end.You would be in breach of the contract and the other party to the contract would have cause to sue you. It would get more expensive for you in the end.You would be in breach of the contract and the other party to the contract would have cause to sue you. It would get more expensive for you in the end.