It is a coordinating conjunction. It connects the two sentences --- We arrived early + we could not find a seat
The conjunction "yet" is being used as an adversative conjunction in the sentence. It shows a contrast or contradiction between arriving early and not finding a seat.
In the sentence, "yet" is a coordinating conjunction.
Coordinating conjunction.
The conjunction "yet" is a coordinating conjunction that joins two independent clauses in the sentence. It shows the relationship between the arrival time and the inability to find a seat.
The underlined adverb clause modifies an infinitive in the sentence: "She arrived early to win the race." In this sentence, "to win the race" is the infinitive phrase, and the adverb clause "early" modifies the purpose or reason for her arrival.
An example sentence using the word "conjunction": The police department displayed its helicopter, SWAT van, and hot rod police car in conjunction with the local community's drug awareness week.
In the sentence, "yet" is a coordinating conjunction.
In the sentence, "yet" is a coordinating conjunction.
Coordinating conjunction.
Sam never comes to school early .The train has arrived early. It's supposed to arrive after 5 minutes!Adverbs of time go at the end of the sentence.
Early, quietly, slowly. Three.
it's "He arrived early at school", although i think the other one is correct too
The exprees train arrived early and waited on the platform. Express yourself clearly when you speak in public.
Arrived is intransitive. Early is an adverb, not a direct object.
Since "early" can function as an adjective as well as an adverb, you can use it to describe a noun, as in: "It was an early train." So you are saying that the train came before the expected time, or that out of a group of trains, it ran before most of the others. Alternatively, you can use it to describe a verb, for instance: "She arrived early." So you are saying that the way in which she arrived was early.
I find it difficult to figure out what your question means. If you are asking if the sentences: "She wanted to leave early or She wanted to stay overnight?" contain dependent clause, the answer is NO. "She wanted to leave early." and "She wanted to stay overnight." are both independent clauses. the OR used to connect the two clauses is a coordinate conjunction. you can tell if the other clause is a dependent clause if the conjunction used is a subordinating conjunction.
The clause "since you left our house early" is an adverb clause (of cause). Why the early departure caused the car to be washed is not clear. If not for 'early' the clause could just as easily be one of time, "since you left the house" being the time after which the car was washed.---The sentence is not only awkward but the usage of the word since is not appropriate and ambiguous. This occurs when transliterations of any Indo Aryan or Indo Burmese generic language is used to express it in English semantics.The word since would imply a time from some moment to the present:eg: I have been working since nine o'clock.(the action is till the present moment)I washed since early morning X (does not extend the time agreement)1. The word since can be preposition to mean before or after a specific time in a sentence.2. It could be used as a conjunction to mean because or from the time that.3.It could be used as an adverb to mean since that timeor event We washed the car is the first sentence with the conjunction since to connect the second sentence : you left our house early.The sentence to qualify with a subordinate clause can be restructured:The car was washed since you left our house early morning . (adverb clause of reason)
She was in the shop early so she could get the fish when it was fresh.