Want this question answered?
Yes, it would be difficult. You would have to be completely protected from the atmosphere all the time.
Breathe
you would burn to death you would not be able to breath
To do what? Row? That would be impossible as there is no evidence of water on the moon.
Rainbows would be extremely difficult to see in the dark.
the evidence might fade off and would be more difficult to trace the evidence
I would think it's because they think you are mocking them.
I would think being deaf and blind.
In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.In the United States it does not. It would be difficult to think of any justification for religion to exempt someone from supporting their own children.
it would be more difficult to live without antibiotics (I think)
Yes, but it could be very difficult to interpret the graph. However, if some of the variables were qualitative or binary, it would not be too bad.
Discard it all.
This is not particularly difficult. Just think about what you would want if you were a customer.
Theories in science are supported by evidence and not ' proved. ' That said, one would think that the variation in the sexes mating stratagies would offer some strong cross cultural evidence.
I think it is because of the choices we have to make, and this makes for a difficult life if we make the wrong choice. If we gave more thought to the choices we make life would be a lot less difficult.
"Many people can interpret things in a way that you didn't mean. (misinterpret)"A professional staff is assigned to interpret speeches at the UN. (translate)"Sigmund Freud was among early psychologists who taught patients to interpret their dreams."
A "literalist" would interpret the Constitution just as it is written, rather than interpret its meaning in context.