answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Ad hominem fallacy

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

The argument contains the fallacy of hasty generalization, where Abbey makes a broad generalization about all rich people based on a limited sample size of five individuals. This does not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What type of fallacy does abbeys argument contain?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What type of fallacy is used here?

Without knowing the specific statement or argument in question, I can't determine the fallacy being used. If you provide the statement or argument, I can help identify the fallacy.


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

This type of fallacy is called an ad hominem fallacy or ad hominem attack. The Latin term means "to the man" i.e. attacking the speaker rather than refuting the argument. It may also be referred to as an irrelevance.


What can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?

Type your answer here... A logical fallacy


What type of logical fallacy asserts an argument that is based on popularity rather than on evidence and reasoning?

bandwagon


What type of logical fallacy does this passage from The Damnation of a Canyon contain?

Ad hominem


Attacking the person instead of the argument is a type logical fallacy called?

ad hominem


When a speaker insults his or her opponent personally rather than focusing on the argument what type of fallacy is being used?

Straw man


What is 'ad hominum'?

Ad hominem is a Latin term meaning "to the person." It is a type of logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the points they are making. This type of argument is considered invalid as it does not directly address the issue at hand.


What is beginning with an is and deducing it to ought is what type of fallacy?

The naturalist fallacy.


What is a Guilt trip fallacy?

A guilt trip fallacy occurs when someone manipulates another's emotions, especially guilt, to win an argument or persuade them to take a particular action. Rather than appealing to reason or evidence, this fallacy relies on exploiting the feelings of the other person to achieve a desired outcome. It can be a form of emotional manipulation that undermines logical discourse.


What does ad hominem mean?

Ad hominem refers to a type of argument that attacks a person's character or attributes rather than focusing on the validity of their argument or point of view. It is considered a logical fallacy because it does not address the actual issue being discussed.


What is the equivalence fallacy?

An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating tow items that are not, in fact, equal. An author who suggests that one act of serious wrongdoing does not differ from a minor offence commits the fallacy of moral equivalence. A different kind of Equivalence Fallacy is used when, for example, a politician argues: "Yes, I used illegal money to fund my campaign ... but so did my opponent!" This type of moral equivalence fallacy is called the "tu quo" argument ("But you're one too!").