0
What views federalism as a mixed set of responsibilities in which all levels of government are engaged in a variety of issues and programs?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
cooperative federalism
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the Responsibilities of an engaged people?
responsibilities of an engaged
When legislators help constituents with problems they have with government agencies and programs, legislators are engaged in?
casework
The responsibilities of being engaged?
Getting engaged is a training field to be sure that you are suited to each other before you take the vows to be married. The vows should be taken seriously and it means you have promised each other to be true to each other throughout your life until death do you part. One does not get married as a 'test run.' While engaged it is time to make plans as to what you both wants such as a career; furthering your education or when both of you feel having children will fit into your lives. There are programs engaged couples can attend to prepare them for marriage.
What was that most basic goal of progressive liberalism?
to make government more efficient, less corrupt and more democratic
Does the government offer small business financing?
If your small business is engaged in scientific research and development (R&D), you may qualify for federal grants under the SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) and the STTR (Small Business Technology Transfer) programs.
Could anyone find any information about what corporation or businesses are engaged in financing the liger research programs?
there is no such thing as a liger
Sentence with the word quantative in it?
Due to the economic meltdown the Government engaged in quantative easing.
What is Civics?
Civics is the study of the rights and duties of citizenship, as well as the functioning of government and how it affects society. It covers topics like the role of government, the rights and responsibilities of citizens, and the structure of political systems. Understanding civics helps individuals become informed, engaged members of their community and society.
How does federalism limit powers of government in the US?
Federalism is an obsolete concept originally envisioned by the founders, where the States had powers the Federal Government did not have and vice versa. That is, there was a division of powers between the States and the Federal Government. Over time this concept has been essentially wiped out by actions of Congress and the Supreme Court. For example, the 10th amendment to the Constitution says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Though the word Federalism is not in the constitution, this amendment is a fairly clear statement of what the founders meant by Federalism. However, as far as I know this amendment is impotent today.When I was a child the Supreme Court honored the rule that anything not involving interstate commerce was controlled and regulated by the states. Try to think of any such thing today. Sarcastically, I would say anything or anybody that travels on or near or somewhere within 200 miles of a highway that crosses state lines or connects to such a highway or road is engaged in interstate commerce. So, everything is engaged in interstate commerce. The 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to restrict the Federal Government and only the Federal Government from enacting gun laws because they were guarding against them restricting State Militias. Today the Feds have enacted an almost uncountable number of gun laws they impose on the States, including a Federal Law on how close to a City public school you can have a firearm. I don't think it's possible to go further than that to wipe out Federalism. They have laws making the use of marijuana grown within a state illegal. Federal Mandates where the Feds threaten to withhold support normally provided if the States don't do anything they choose to demand. For example, the drinking age nationwide used to vary from state to state. However, the federal government threatened to take away highway funds from any state with a drinking age below 21. Although each state could have chosen to forgo those federal funds, at a major penalty no state has chosen to do so -- letting the federal government effectively legislate a national drinking age of 21. Each of these is accompanied by a contrived reason why it falls within the powers of the Feds and explains away the 10th Amendment.These are only some of many ways the Federal Government has abrogated the intent of the founders regarding Federalism. So, to answer your question, Federalism no longer limits the power of government in the US
How the federalism limit the power of government in the US?
Federalism is an obsolete concept originally envisioned by the founders, where the States had powers the Federal Government did not have and vice versa. That is, there was a division of powers between the States and the Federal Government. Over time this concept has been essentially wiped out by actions of Congress and the Supreme Court. For example, the 10th amendment to the Constitution says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Though the word Federalism is not in the constitution, this amendment is a fairly clear statement of what the founders meant by Federalism. However, as far as I know this amendment is impotent today.When I was a child the Supreme Court honored the rule that anything not involving interstate commerce was controlled and regulated by the states. Try to think of any such thing today. Sarcastically, I would say anything or anybody that travels on or near or somewhere within 200 miles of a highway that crosses state lines or connects to such a highway or road is engaged in interstate commerce. So, everything is engaged in interstate commerce. The 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to restrict the Federal Government and only the Federal Government from enacting gun laws because they were guarding against them restricting State Militias. Today the Feds have enacted an almost uncountable number of gun laws they impose on the States, including a Federal Law on how close to a City public school you can have a firearm. I don't think it's possible to go further than that to wipe out Federalism. They have laws making the use of marijuana grown within a state illegal. Federal Mandates where the Feds threaten to withhold support normally provided if the States don't do anything they choose to demand. For example, the drinking age nationwide used to vary from state to state. However, the federal government threatened to take away highway funds from any state with a drinking age below 21. Although each state could have chosen to forgo those federal funds, at a major penalty no state has chosen to do so -- letting the federal government effectively legislate a national drinking age of 21. Each of these is accompanied by a contrived reason why it falls within the powers of the Feds and explains away the 10th Amendment.These are only some of many ways the Federal Government has abrogated the intent of the founders regarding Federalism. So, to answer your question, Federalism no longer limits the power of government in the US
What is the different between duty based and engaged citizen?
A duty-based citizen believes in fulfilling their obligations and responsibilities to society, such as obeying laws and paying taxes. An engaged citizen, on the other hand, actively participates in civic activities and works to improve their community through volunteerism, advocacy, and voting.
What is sales organization structure?
A sales organization defines duties, roles, rights, and responsibilities of sales people engaged in selling activities meant for the effective execution of the sales function.
