0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who argued in the Webster Hayne Debate?
The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.
Where was Daniel Webster position of nullification?
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
Who challenged Robert Hayne in a senate debate on states' rights?
Daniel Webster
The 1830 debate between Senators Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne focused on?
slavery
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
What was Webster-Hayne Debate?
Derpyderp
What was Webster Hayne Debate?
Derpyderp
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts in congress in the Webster hayne debate in 1830?
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
What issue did Daniel Webster and Robert hayne argue in the Webster-hayne debate?
Hayne, a politician during Jackson's presidency, raised many issues about State's rights and Slavery. Some of his comments revolved around the tariff of 1828. He said the Tariff, "was producing a spirit of jealousy and distrust" (Meacham 127).
What was the Hayne - Webster debate?
Doctrine of Nullification.
What was the Webster -Hayne debate about?
Doctrine of Nullification.
