answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)

Justice Potter Stewart voted with the 6-3 majority to apply the Exclusionary Rule (Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure protection) to the states, but didn't write a separate concurring opinion.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The dissenting opinion was that the 4th amendment is only used by the federal government therefore overruling the exclusionary rule (rule that illegally obtained evidence should be excluded from a trial).

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was Justice Stewart's opinion in the US Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

. What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.


What does mean when a supreme court justice issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.


One a Supreme Court Justice disagrees with the majority opinion of the court what is he or she doing?

A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.


Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?

A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).


An opinion written by a Supreme Court Justice who disagrees with the outcome of a case is called a?

dissenting opinion


A justice of the supreme court may write a dissenting opinion to?

add points to the majority opinion


What is an opinion written by a US Supreme Court justice who agrees with the minority opinion?

The term "minority opinion" is a bit unorthodox, considering those who vote against the majority may not be unified in their reasoning. When a Supreme Court justice wants to express disagreement with the opinion of the Court (usually the majority), he or she may write a dissenting opinion. It is not necessary for the dissenting justice to agree with anyone else on the Court.


What does a US Supreme Court justice write when agreeing with the majority?

A concurring opinion


An opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with a case but does not agree with its legal logic is called a?

concurring opinion


What is an Associate Justice on the US Supreme Court?

Associate Justice is the formal title for any US Supreme Court justice who is not the Chief Justice. There are eight Associate Justices and one Chief Justice on the Supreme Court.


What are four kinds of Supreme Court opinions?

The Four types of Supreme Court Opinions Includes: Unanimous Opinion: When the Supreme Court Justice Unanimously agrees with the decision. Majority Opinion: When the Majority agrees with the decision Concurrent Opinion: When a person agrees with the Majority of the decision, but for different reasons. Dissenting Opinion: When A person disagree with the Majority of the decision.


What references does Chief Justice Earl Warren make support the Supreme Court's opinion?

Laws & ruling.