Dhani Harrison (George Harrison's son) told Rolling Stone "If anyone hasn't been influenced by [The Beatles] at some point, they're probably lying."
You would have to realize that by a longshot of the impact on music and raw songwriting that The Beatles are much more valuable.
Positive
It was a terrible day for the fans, it was as if they lost their hearts.
He was a major player in the Beatles, probably the most talented member. The group's impact on society is well documented, and Paul's work after the Beatles stands as a testimony to his talent.
Because the Beatles were the most popular pop group of all time and they have an impact that still brings waves of fans every generation.
Paul McCartney is no longer an impact on our lives, unless you are very close to McCartney or are an immense Beatles fan.
The Beatles _________ I'd tend to agree the Beatles, because their impact was wider (and slightly earlier) and because they popularised the new production techniques of the later 1960s. The early Stones however had arguably a greater impact on "alternative" rock through their influence on the emerging US garage scene which in turn fed into 1970s punk and some of its offspring, feeding into later stripped-down underground "edgy", "angular" sounds and the rebel attitudes that often accompany them.
The Beatles
The Beatles were often referred to as "The Fab Four." This nickname highlighted their popularity and appeal during the height of their fame in the 1960s. It emphasized not only their talent as musicians but also their charismatic personalities and cultural impact.
Mick Jagger never joined The Beatles; he is the lead singer of The Rolling Stones, a separate band that formed in 1962. The Beatles were formed in 1960, and while both bands were contemporaries and had a significant impact on rock music, they remained distinct entities throughout their careers. Jagger was born on July 26, 1943, and The Beatles' first album was released in 1963.
Yes, the Beatles were real.the-beatles
The BeaTles.