Its bad because of problems with the evidence that he is the rightful claimant. The Bayeux Tapestry depicts that Harold offered the throne to William in the form of an oath. However, The Bayeux Tapestry doesn't explain why Harold was in Normandy, nor does it illustrate what the oath he swore was. Moreover, the Tapestry was made during 1070's and therefore not close to the event date.
The other source that portrays Williams Claim was through William of Poitiers even though he was not present.
it depends, if they liked him and he was good to them the of course however if he was bad to them they hated him as a king.
he was not a bad leader, but he threw people of the throne.
Richard III was not evil. He had strong, legitimate claim to the throne and took it. Points to make: 1. If this relates to the play by Shakespeare: the playwright to poetic lisence and not everything he wrote is true 2. If this has to do with the Princes in the Tower, there is no evidence he had anything to do with their disappearance.
It was bad because the English King has died; Hadrada was killed in battle.Consequently, William of Normandy takes the throne. This was bad because, he wasn't English and he wasn't popular with England (Normandy is in France).Getting hit in the eye would disable you or kill you. No one's sure whether he got killed instantly or was disabled and then finished off.
William Penn and his son had a bad relationship. William Sr neglected his son all the time.
it depends, if they liked him and he was good to them the of course however if he was bad to them they hated him as a king.
Edgar the Atheling, also known as Edgar Ætheling, was seen as indecisive and lacking strong leadership qualities. He struggled to assert his claim to the English throne during the Norman Conquest, ultimately failing to secure it. His perceived weaknesses contributed to the diminished support for the Anglo-Saxon cause in the fight against William the Conqueror.
he was not a bad leader, but he threw people of the throne.
It took him ten years. He lost his entire crew. He had to slip into town incognito for fear of be assassinated, and he had to kill the suitors before he could claim his rightful throne. All in all, not too bad.
Richard III was not evil. He had strong, legitimate claim to the throne and took it. Points to make: 1. If this relates to the play by Shakespeare: the playwright to poetic lisence and not everything he wrote is true 2. If this has to do with the Princes in the Tower, there is no evidence he had anything to do with their disappearance.
Usually in a bad faith insurance claim the insurance company is in the wrong. A bad faith claim is when an insurance company fails to pay out what was promised on the claim. More than likely you could sue the insurance company and have a chance at winning your case.
He wasn't heir to the throne!
William (KickAss) Still was a bad, bad man. He was the founder of the wover foundation.
Big Bad Bill - Is Sweet William Now - was created in 1924.
It was bad because the English King has died; Hadrada was killed in battle.Consequently, William of Normandy takes the throne. This was bad because, he wasn't English and he wasn't popular with England (Normandy is in France).Getting hit in the eye would disable you or kill you. No one's sure whether he got killed instantly or was disabled and then finished off.
In my opinion i don't think William Was a bad king he was actually quite good hoped this helped :D
In my opinion i don't think William Was a bad king he was actually quite good hoped this helped :D