Want this question answered?
5110
That the Constitution had no bill of rights.
having factions to protect individual liberties
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
the Federalist were all for the constitution and the anti-federalist were against it because they thought it needed a bill of rights to protect individual rights!
The major argument put worth by the anti-federalists for not ratifying the U. S. Constitution was that it gave the national government too much power. Patrick Henry is an example of someone who was a prominent anti-federalist.
He was a federalist that believed in having a strong central government by creating the national bank.
5110
That the Constitution had no bill of rights.
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
He was a very influential delegate at the Constitutional Convention. Some of his writings, which includes The Federalist and The Federalist Papers, convinced many New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution. He was one of the many great thinkers at that time.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The country needs a strong central government
establishing the first national bank of the United States as a way to manage money across state borders
he hated poloticts
having factions to protect individual liberties
The Federalist written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton