answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Popular Soverenty (Kansas and Nebraska used it)

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

The issue of whether a state would be free or slave was based on factors such as the economic system in place (agricultural vs. industrial), social values concerning slavery, and political power dynamics within the state. These factors influenced whether the state's population supported the institution of slavery or opposed it.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was it based upon to make a state be free or slave?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Why was it easy to make a free black a slave under the fugitive slave law?

Under the Fugitive Slave Law, it was easy to make a free black a slave because the law required individuals to cooperate in capturing and returning alleged fugitive slaves, often leading to false accusations and kidnappings of free black individuals who were then wrongfully enslaved. The law had very limited due process protections for alleged fugitive slaves, making it easier for slaveowners to exploit the system and claim free black individuals as their property.


Which was slave and which was free?

Slaves were individuals who were considered legal property and were not free to leave their owners. Free individuals had the legal right to move about and make choices independently of others.


Why did chief justice Taney think Dred Scott should not be free?

Chief Justice Taney believed that Dred Scott should not be free because he argued that African Americans, whether slave or free, were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution. Taney also argued that the federal government did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, which meant that Scott's residence in a free state did not make him free.


What was it like for a slave to be free?

For many slaves, gaining freedom was a life-changing experience filled with a mix of emotions such as relief, excitement, and uncertainty. Being free meant having control over their own lives, being able to make decisions for themselves, and potentially reuniting with loved ones. However, freedom also often came with challenges such as finding work, housing, and facing discrimination.


Why did slave owners keep slaves?

Slave owners kept slaves primarily to exploit their labor for economic gain. Slaves provided free labor that allowed slave owners to increase their wealth and maintain a lucrative lifestyle without incurring labor costs. It was a deeply unethical practice that prioritized profit over the humanity and well-being of enslaved individuals.

Related questions

Why the admission of Missouri as a slave state was controversial in the senate?

It was because they had an even number of slave and free states. If Missouri came in as a slave state then it would make it uneven.


The admission of Missouri as a slave state was controversial in the senate because?

It was because they had an even number of slave and free states. If Missouri came in as a slave state then it would make it uneven and it would upset the balance.


Did the Missouri compromise of 1820 make Missouri a slave state?

Under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 Missouri was admitted as a slave state and Maine as a free state.


What is the importance of California becoming a state?

well California was a part of mexico originally, around the time we were trying to become a state, the United states had an even number of slave/no slave states California wanted to enter in as a free(no slave) state. his caused an issue because it would obviously make the free side bigger and the slave states thought it would bring an end to slave states. Despite this after a lot of "debates" California was voted in, and because we entered as a free state we basically started the civil war, there were other factors but we were a big art in it.


What impact did westward expansion have on the issue of slavery in the US?

It made the issue even more prevalent. People had the decision to make a state free or a slave state.


Was California a free or a slave state and how was that decision made?

This vast territory extended so far on either side of the Missouri line that a new Compromise had to be worked out. To get California admitted as free soil, Congress had to make special concessions to the South, of which the most controversial was the Fugitive Slave Act, where official slave-catchers were appointed, to hunt down runaways. This raised the temperature of the debate, and certainly hastened the onset of civil war.


Did kansas enter the union as a free state slave or undeclared state?

Under the terms of the Act, two territories were to be formed, Kansas and Nebraska. One would presumably become a slave state and the other a free state. Popular sovereignty would prevail and it was assumed that slave-owning Southerners would occupy Kansas and make it a slave state, while free state advocates would settle Nebraska. Things worked out as anticipated in Nebraska, but not in Kansas. Kansas was a Free State.


What was the reason to create Maine?

To keep the balance between slave and free states equal. Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state, which made the anti-slavery activists angry. So, they decided to make Maine a free state as well so there would be an equal number.


Did the Rio Grande River play a role in slavery?

Yes, Texas as a Republc, as a US State, and as a Confederate state was a slave state. Mexico had abolished slavery in 1826 and if a Texas slave could make it across the river they were free to become colonists in Mexico.


How did the supreme court add to the tension over slavery in the 1850s?

Because the North didn't want slaves, but the south did, so the supreme court was trying to figure out whether the should make California a slave state or a free slave state.


Did the Compromise of 1850 admitt California as a free state?

Yes. That's why they had to make a special gesture to appease the South, in strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act.


Why did Dred Scott sue Emerson?

Dred Scott sued his slaveholder because he was treating him as a slave even though they had lived in a non slaveholding state ... [Scott and his slaveholder had moved from Missouri, a slave state, to Illinois, a free state, and back to Missouri.] The Supreme Court ruled (1856) that Scott's residence in a free state did not make him a free person. This decision gave further impetus to the abolitionist movement, in that it suggested that laws against slavery would be held to be invalid, and was one of the causes of the civil war.