terrible
I think you mean "How were the Aboriginals mistreated by the European Settlers?" If that's what you meant, well the Aboriginal people were believed to be racially inferior to the European people. The Europeans mistreated them by abusing them in many disgusting ways and made them live in missons. Now Missions were town-like areas where Aboriginal people were forced to stay, in an attempt to teach them to behave like the Europeans, however they were mainly children and young adults, thus referring to the Stolen Generation. These people were whipped, beaten and sometimes isolated. They received food rations and were being forced to convert to Christianity and exhibit the dogma of the Europeans.
Humans first arrived in what would become Kuwait around 100,000 years ago and parts of Kuwait were part of Ancient Sumeria. It's not like somebody planted a flag and said "I Explorer X have discovered Kuwait" like Europeans did when they arrived in the Americas or Australia.
The Europeans did a great many things to the Aborigines. When the white settlers came, the Aborigines were dispossessed of their land and, much later, "encouraged" onto reserves, supposedly for their protection. They were forced off their traditional hunting grounds, and herded away from the fertile coastal areas where there was plenty of food. White settlers wrecked the very effective native fishing traps, cleared native habitats and reduced the native food supplies, as well as polluting their water. Massacres of the indigenous people occurred on a regular basis. The Coniston massacre, the massacre at Myall Creek, the "Battle of Risdon" in Tasmania and many others, all were perpetrated against the Aborigines by the Europeans. There were years of conflict between Tasmanian Aborigines and white settlers which eventually resulted in the loss of the purebred aboriginal race from Tasmania - virtually genocide. The Europeans also introduced foods and diseases, all of which were perfectly harmless to the white settlers, but lowered the life expectancy of the aboriginal people. Simple diseases like Measles and Influenza had devastating effects on Aborigines. Foods containing wheat and sugar resulted in heart disease and obesity among the indigenous Australians. Europeans introduced new flora and fauna which took over native habitat, leading to the extinction of many plants and animals on which the Aborigines relied. When the aboriginal children were forcibly taken from their families, this directly led to a loss of culture, language, customs and traditions among the Aborigines. When the Europeans first came to Australia, there were around 250 different aboriginal languages in Australia. There is just a fraction of that number now. Many stories from the aboriginal Dreaming (creation legends) have disappeared forever.
The idea that someone can become an Aboriginal is a question of being accepted and identifying as something else. Someone migrating from another country to Australia becomes an 'Australian' hence they have become something else. If Aboriginal people were the ruling class Australia people would be known as 'Aboriginals' rather than Australians. It basically comes down to how open minded people are. The term Aboriginal is a blanket term and one that is used in a generalised way that imposes a stereotype that Aboriginal people are one race with one language and one set of beliefs. This is not the case. Before colonisation Australia was made up of hundreds of tribes with different languages and cultural practices. The point is that if you want to become something else you can. You may not have the same blood but that does not mean that you cannot become something else based on that fact alone. A person can become an Aboriginal without having Aboriginal blood. In a bureaucratic sense it is possible: Demonstrated by the fact that on paper an Aboriginal person can become an 'Australian'. In a more traditional sense if a person was to learn,practice, and live in a traditional manner, and be accepted, and/or identify as Aboriginal they clearly have in a sense become Aboriginal. The opposing argument in my opinion is like arguing that the royal family has a bloodline that is a higher order than that of another, and that to be a royal you must already be a royal. it is a futile argument. Bloodlines change and evolve and never stay the same forever. Their are people that identify as Aboriginal who have a small percentage of Aboriginal blood there are those who are full blood, there are those who have no Aboriginal blood In reality it is how you live, treat others, and identify as a person that defines what you are or what you become.
His chilhood was like other aboriginal children's childhood at that time.
it was a great lifetyle
Slavery in pre-colonial Africa was diverse and varied across different regions. In some societies, slaves were assimilated into the community and could rise to positions of power, while in others they were used for manual labor. Slavery was often a result of warfare, debt, or punishment, and slaves could be traded both within Africa and with neighboring regions.
Life in America before Europeans arrived was described as pretty primitive. These natives relied only on nature and how they could use it.
I think you mean "How were the Aboriginals mistreated by the European Settlers?" If that's what you meant, well the Aboriginal people were believed to be racially inferior to the European people. The Europeans mistreated them by abusing them in many disgusting ways and made them live in missons. Now Missions were town-like areas where Aboriginal people were forced to stay, in an attempt to teach them to behave like the Europeans, however they were mainly children and young adults, thus referring to the Stolen Generation. These people were whipped, beaten and sometimes isolated. They received food rations and were being forced to convert to Christianity and exhibit the dogma of the Europeans.
They were people
garbage
Rome is in Europe. Its inhabitants were always predominantly European.
The Europeans thought nothing of the Aboriginals when they arrived on Australia's shores. As a matter of fact they saw Australia as empty land. Note: When William Dampier arrived in 1688, he referred to the Aborigines as "the miserablest people in the world". Like many other Europeans, he misjudged the Aborigines, not recognising their unique skills.
there was no economy. America was only inhabited by the native Americans. only wild land existed when the europeans arrived.
The Aboriginal people believe Uluru is sacred.
Like many of the English settlers of his time, Gregory Blaxland regarded Aborigines with a mixture of fear and condescension. Because so little was known about the aboriginal culture, Europeans were afraid of what they could not understand, yet tended to think they were better and "more civilised" than the Aborigines. Blaxland was no different in this regard.
Aboriginal.