answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Lamarck's incorrect hypothesis regarding inheritance....

Lamarck did not know how traits were inherited (Traits are passed through genes)

Genes are not changed by activities in life. They change through mutation occurs before an organism is born.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was lamarck's incorrect hypothesis regarding inheritance?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was Lamarcks theory?

Lamarck's Hypothesis of Evolution(Small note before answer: Lamarck had a hypothesis, not a theory) Lamarck, as well as other naturalists, hypothesized evolution via environmental change before Darwin. However, many failed to account for changes in the fossil record and interactions of the phenotypes of animals on their environment. Despite Lamarck's advances in the field, he is most remembered in history for the incorrect mechanisms of this evolution that he posited.Lamarck's hypothesis of evolution appeared in his Zoological Philosophical Work written in 1809, featuring two mechanisms of evolutionary change: use and disuse and inheritance of acquired characteristics.His evolutionary hypothesis was as follows:Environmental changes generate new needsThese needs determine the use or disuse of some organsSuch organs develop or are diminishedThe acquired characters are hereditary


Which of lamarcks ideas was later found to be incorrect?

The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.


Was lamarcks idea of acquired traits proven or rejected?

rejected.


What parts of Lamarcks hypotheses have been proved wrong?

Animal behaviors are not inheritable.


What aspect of Jean Baptiste Lamarcks theories concerning the inheritance of acquired traits has been proved false?

Lamarck believed that changes acquired during an animal's life could be inherited by their offspring. We now know that inheritance does not work in this way. For example, if you are a body builder, and develop big muscles, your children will not inherit large muscles. Inherirtance works through genes, which are inherited through the egg and sperm from the parents.


How is lamarcks theory of evolution different from theory of evolution?

Make me cum daddy~! Make me moan~!


How was Darwin's theory of evolution different from lamarcks?

In Darwin's theory, natural selection plays the key role. Organisms vary through random mutations--slight changes from their parents. The environment determines which are most likely to survive. In Lamarck's theory, changes in phenotype are inherited. This is now known to be (largely) incorrect.


What was lamarcks hypothesis about how species change?

Lamarck's hypothesis about evolution was that animals would change based on their environment during their lifetime and pass on those traits to their offspring. This is different from Darwin's theory in that all animals mutate in someway and it's the surviving mutations that pass on that slowly change the animal over many generations.


What do you think of Wallace's critique of lamarcks?

he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist


How does evolution by natural selection differ from lamarcks view of evolution?

Lamark believed that behaviors learned by parents could become inheritable traits.


What do you think of Wallace's critique of lamarcks hypotheses?

he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist


What is an example of traits that you would expect to inherit if Lamarck's explanation of evolution were correct?

if I were to inherit traits based on Lamarcks explanation of evolution were correct we wouldn't be the people we are now. Lamarcks´ explanation was that acquired characteristics were genetically passed to the offspring so if that were so, the human brains would be much more developed, more knowledge, and bigger parts of the body. This question is also tricky since a human would turn out to be a giant by the time they got to the 100th offspring