Well, the economy could have been doing better to say that much. Life for the lower classes? It wasn't that great. Not much money was available for anyone. Often times, those that had money were wealthy in some way.
hard.
Much like today, anyone could dance, it wan't confined to a class.
In 1912 only 20% of the population of Britain were middle class, they would have played games like lawn tennis and snooker. Reading was also popular in 1912. They probably would have had at least one servant and life would have been a lot better than the working class.
A tyrant was appointed to give some equality in a city-state split by upper classes exploiting the lower classes. The tyrant's problem was that the aristocracy would set out to assassinate him in order to regain ascendancy and control. The tyrant would have to establish a large bodyguard, and to pay for them, collect a tax. All classes hated taxes, so the tyrant's support waned and would be expelled, with either the aristocrats taking over or a democracy was set up by the lower classes.
Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.Roman society was arranged in social classes. The patricians and plebeians were at the top of the heap, followed by the equites and then the proletariat who were followed by the freedmen and lastly the slaves. There was upward mobility in the lower classes. A person's status many times depended upon his wealth.
yeh mate
hard.
like business , we can give many other examples in our life which we are the classes of partnership
Life for women in 1912 was extremely unfair as they were forced to do stuff by there husbands1 and were often bullied into things2 and they had no power to vote or do anything that would change the governments ideas3.
Much like today, anyone could dance, it wan't confined to a class.
Life for poor women in 1912 was very difficult. They only served the purpose of providing cheap labor to the well-off families.
yes there is a cruise like suite life on deck
Life for the poor in 1912 was very tough to go through. They didn't have much money, not enough food and were often treated like they were dirt. They always were on the last of the popularity line and were staged as "third class".
Do you have a question about this? Yes. I would like to know how guys go about it? Where are the classes held and what it's like for the guy who's doing it etc.
they say that higher class things have more respect than lower classes because like with a pride of lions they have classes and the alpha male lion has the highest class,
davits
Just Like a Woman - 1912 was released on: USA: 18 April 1912