answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was one of the results of the moral diplomacy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How were the results of the Big Stick policy Dollar Diplomacy and Moral Diplomacy similar in Latin America?

The results of these policies were all aimed at asserting U.S. influence and control in Latin America. They all sought to promote American economic interests under the guise of promoting stability and democracy in the region. However, they often led to resentment and resistance from Latin American countries that viewed these policies as imperialism.


What best describes moral diplomacy?

Moral diplomacy is a system that gives support to the countries that have moral beliefs that are in line with the country that is giving support. Moral diplomacy was proposed by US President Woodrow Wilson in his 1912 election.


Significance of Moral diplomacy?

Moral diplomacy is significant as it emphasizes the importance of promoting democratic values, advocating for human rights, and pursuing peaceful resolutions to conflicts. By prioritizing moral principles in foreign policy, nations can build trust, strengthen relationships, and foster international cooperation based on shared values. This approach can help to enhance global stability and security while upholding ethical standards in diplomatic engagements.


Who created an administration based on ''moral diplomacy''?

US President Woodrow Wilson created an administration based on Moral Diplomacy. The idea was to support countries that had the same moral beliefs as the US.


Which policy favored honorable diplomacy but still resorted to military intervention upon occasion?

moral diplomacy


How president Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy differ from Roosevelt's big stick policy of military?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.


How President Woodrow wilsons Moral diplomacy differ from Roosevelt's big stick policy of military force?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.


How president Woodrow wilsons moral diplomacy differ from roosevelt big stick policy of military force?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.


How president Woodrow wilsons moral diplomacy differ from roosevelts big stick policy of military force?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.


How president woodrow wilson's moral diplomacy differ from roosevelt's big stick policy of military force?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.


How President Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy differ from Roosevelts big stick policy of military force?

"moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opprotunity.


How president Woodrow Wilson's 'moral diplomacy' differ from Roosevelt's 'big stick' policy of military force?

"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.