all of the above
all of the above
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
No. The sharecropper owed money and rent to the person who owned the land. This left him almost penniless and in debt. It was nearly slavery.
The can help to grow the country. They will provide money to the growing government along with issue money to the people to use to grow the economy.
all of the above
all of the above
Howeva yo moma make
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
Because at first, the sharecropper wanted to get a place to live, food, and money. The landowner wanted a person to grow crops for him. The sharecropper got half the crops he grew, shelter provided by the landowner, and money from any extra crop. This fulfilled all of the sharecropper's needs. The landowner got half of the crops grown by the sharecropper, and he didn't even have to do ANYTHING. That is why sharecropping looked like a good idea for both sides in the beginning.
they had to stay on the land until they could pay
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)
because an idepentant farmer would have to vary with crops and the wheather, which means in some seasons he could earn very little money for growing insufficent crops while a sharecropper would be required to give up whatever he grew to be able to stay on the land saying that independent farmers had to grow specific crops but sharecroppers could grow any crop not depending on the seesons they grow in by Najla. s
No. The sharecropper owed money and rent to the person who owned the land. This left him almost penniless and in debt. It was nearly slavery.
because an idepentant farmer would have to vary with crops and the wheather, which means in some seasons he could earn very little money for growing insufficent crops while a sharecropper would be required to give up whatever he grew to be able to stay on the land saying that independent farmers had to grow specific crops but sharecroppers could grow any crop not depending on the seesons they grow in by Najla. s
Farmers got their money by planting crops during the growing season and waiting until they grow and then they sell them or trade for cash. The farmers dought to cross a river to get too the town.