the main objestion was that in the closed beakers there was no air and no oxygen .so the abiogenesis supporters said that reproduction cannot take place without oxygen so in short the answer is the main objection was the non availibity of oxygen
Redi refuted "spontaneous generation". At the time it was believed that rotting meat spontaneously produced flies! All he did was take 2 identical jars of rotting meat but covered one with cotton cloth so the air could enter but no flies. The second jar was UNCOVERED and flies did get in. Only this jar developed maggots which became flies.
The production of flies from rotting meat could only happen if adults laid eggs.
So you know whether it is valid or not. If it isn't modify your hypothesis to fit the results of your experiments.
they see if it supported their hypothesis
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
to orove the hypothesis is correct
Hypotheses can never be totally proven because only portions of populations are used to test them. There are many variables making it likely that results will not always be the same. However, tests with positive outcomes can strongly infer the likelihood that their hypotheses are correct.
A testable explanation that is supported or refuted is called a hypothesis.
"refute" means to prove to be false or erroneous. Therefore you should abandon your hypothesis because it is wrong.
No. A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.
Francesco Redi's hypothesis was that "spontaneous generation" could not exist. He tested this hypothesis using maggots and meat.
The hypothesis must be able to be proved true or false.
In research, a null hypothesis means that no results will be found. An alternative hypothesis means that results will be found.
Redis was created on 2009-04-10.
Make an observation or ask a question. Form a hypothesis to explain the observation. Conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. Analyze data and draw conclusions to determine if the hypothesis is supported or refuted.
Proposing an explanation for the changing colors of the sky is an example of a scientific hypothesis. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation or prediction that can be tested and supported or refuted through scientific investigation and evidence.
In research, a null hypothesis means that no results will be found. An alternative hypothesis means that results will be found.
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
by all of the results he had after the tested his hypothesis