Actually there is only a 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational uses of international watercourses. I think you got the wording wrong. To read the convention you can use this link : http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf
In 1997, there were more than 100 countries that intended to adopt the UN Watercourses Convection. This convection was aimed to construct a legal framework on the use and protection of international watercourses.
The convention was a bit nerdy.I really enjoyed the convention.
If the nation which is using the banned weapons has signed the Convention, then yes its against the commitment that nation made when it signed the Convention for that nation to use banned weapons, even against a foe who has not.
The normal convention was to leave the comma out of the sentences. They attended the morticians' convention to learn more about the profession.
No
convention
It is a convention, not absolutely rational.
The work at the constitutional convention was not easy, but after a great compromise, they came to an agreement.
The question should probably read, "What is THE mine ban Convention" as that is a popular name for the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, also known as the "Ottawa Convention". The Convention seeks to end existing suffering and to prevent future suffering. It bans the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines. In addition, states that accede to the Convention accept that they will destroy both stockpiled and emplaced anti-personnel mines and assist the victims of mines. In its long form, the mine ban convention is: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction and it is the cornerstone of the international effort to end the suffering and casualties caused by anti-personnel (AP) mines. The Convention was adopted on 18 September 1997 and it entered into force on 1 March 1999. As of 1 September 2008, 156 states had joined. The States Parties to the Convention meet once a year, (once in Geneva, then in a mine-affected country) and have a Review Conference or Summit every five years (only two have taken place: Nairobi and Cartagena). Here's the link to the Convention's site: http://www.apminebanconvention.org/
A group of psychologists gathered at the convention center.
The question should probably read, "What is THE mine ban Convention" as that is a popular name for the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, also known as the "Ottawa Convention". The Convention seeks to end existing suffering and to prevent future suffering. It bans the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines. In addition, states that accede to the Convention accept that they will destroy both stockpiled and emplaced anti-personnel mines and assist the victims of mines. In its long form, the mine ban convention is: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction and it is the cornerstone of the international effort to end the suffering and casualties caused by anti-personnel (AP) mines. The Convention was adopted on 18 September 1997 and it entered into force on 1 March 1999. As of 1 September 2008, 156 states had joined. The States Parties to the Convention meet once a year, (once in Geneva, then in a mine-affected country) and have a Review Conference or Summit every five years (only two have taken place: Nairobi and Cartagena). Here's the link to the Convention's site: http://www.apminebanconvention.org/
The standard convention in American English is to use the period. However, in British English that is not the standard. So, you can do either one and be okay, but it would be best to use the convention that follows more what you write.