Federalists were in favor of the Constitution but anti-federalists were not because they were in fear of losing their rights. Congress included the Bill of Rights as an attachment to satisfy both parties.
Federalists were in favor of the Constitution but anti-federalists were not because they were in fear of losing their rights. Congress included the Bill of Rights as a compromise to satisfy both parties. The compromise is commonly called the "Massachusetts Compromise"
no. he was declaring the bill of rights and the rights of independence.
The Bill of Rights was actually made after the US Constitution. The English Bill of Rights influenced it in some way, though I do not know how. I'm actually trying to figure that out right now myself.
the Bill of Rights
The Great Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise and other smaller compromises were made in the creation of the Constitution.
Nathaniel Gorham was a Federalist. So, he probably agreed with the other Federalists that there should be no Bill of Rights, the Constitution is fine the way it is. But, he probably agreed to the compromise that ratifyed the Constitution and added a bill of Rights. =^..^=
promise of a bill of rights and compromise with anti-federalists
The Bill of Rights was part of a compromise that the federalist made to ensure the proposed federal government could not impinge on the basic rights of it's citizens.
The United States Bill of Rights was actually somewhat of a compromise, meant to ease the concerns of the anti-federalists who thought the US Constitution, without a Bill of Rights, did not sufficiently protect individual rights. It was ratified on December 15, 1791.
"Shay's Rebellion" against taxation in Massachusetts occurred first and was instrumental in persuading states to call the constitutional convention. The "Great Compromise" occurred during the constitutional convention, and the Bill of Rights was last in the list.
Daniel shays delegates then the bill of rights
The Bill of Rights limited the governments intrusion onto the PRE-EXISTING rights listed in the bill. As noted in the preamble to the constitution, some rights of man are self evident, and pre-existed any government formation. Some members of the constitutional committee wanted to ensure that these rights remained sacrosanct, and held out for the compromise that led to the writing of the Bill of Rights.