0
What else can I help you with?
What was the aim and objective of moderates and extremists?
really i dont no! what is it ?
Where did split between the moderates and extremists take place and which year?
B
In which session was Indian national congress split into moderates and extremists?
Surat Session (1907)
Where did the split between the moderates and extremists take place and in which year?
congress session at Surat in 1907.
Who was better moderates or extremists in Indian freedom struggle?
They basially believe in Indian Freedom, they are different in how they act to promote that freedom.
Who were the extremists and moderates?
extremists were the people who were violent and wants only independence and dont wants and other new policy moderates were the people who were not voilent and want that indian government should also there in legislative assembly and want the britishers because they think that britishers are useful for us and with them only our india will be independent
When was Indian national congress split up?
It split into two parts-Moderates and Extremists in 1907 at Surat session of INC
What is the difference between moderates and extremists?
Moderates believed in peaceful methods ( i.e. by writing letters for their demands)whereas extremists believed in protests ( i.e. hartals and strike).
Who were the Indian moderates during freedom struggle?
Bal Ganghadar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Lala Lajpat Rai and Aurobondo Gosh these names appear in extremists list. They vigourously fought with British rules.
What are the Voters who are in the middle of the political spectrum are called?
moderates
What do you mean by extremists?
events of extremists
What are some differences between moderates and extremists?
Typically, a moderate (whether in politics, religion, or other areas of life) is more willing to seek common ground, to listen to other points of view and try to create consensus. Moderates do have their own beliefs, but they are more likely to consider the beliefs of others before making a decision. Sometimes, critics accuse moderates of being too willing to be inclusive; but supporters of this philosophy say that it is useful to respect the views of others and try to seek a middle ground. Extremists, on the other hand, do not believe any middle ground is possible, nor do they think a middle ground is necessary. Extremists tend to be dogmatic and unyielding in their opinions; they believe their way is the only way, that other perspectives are totally wrong. They are unwilling to consider or even listen to the views of others, since they believe (in the domain of politics) the views of their opponents are without any merit, or in the domain of religion, they see the views of others as immoral and sinful. Extremists are likely to try to shut down debate, since they expect that only one viewpoint-- theirs-- should be followed. In some cases, extremists will espouse censoring any discussion, or in other cases, they believe in eliminating "wrong ideas" by imprisoning or killing their opponents.
