It had to do with the Court's attempt to apply the Interstate Commerce Laws in a novel and unique way. See below link for a full discussion:
oatmeal
I need this answer asap
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-v-lopez
The US won
No, the Supreme Court case US v. Lopez (1995) actually limited the power of the national government. The Court ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, asserting that possessing a gun in a school zone is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce. This decision marked a significant shift towards reinforcing states’ rights and restricting federal overreach in areas not explicitly tied to commerce.
The Supreme Court held that Congress could not regulate firearms in school zones as it did not affect interstate commerce.
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964)
The US Supreme Court handed down a decision on McCullochon March 6, 1819.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
because they are stupid and hoe
The majority decision in the case of Goss v. Lopez was written by Justice Potter Stewart. The Supreme Court ruled that students have a constitutional right to due process before being suspended from school, affirming that public school students are entitled to certain procedural protections. The decision emphasized the importance of fair treatment in educational settings.
The case changed history by giving defined borders for implied powers in the Constitution. Gibbons v. Ogden specifically invoked the Interstate Commerce Clause for the first time.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)