answersLogoWhite

0

The Supreme Court held that Congress could not regulate firearms in school zones as it did not affect interstate commerce.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who won the goss v Lopez case?

oatmeal


How did the case for goss v Lopez effect the country?

I need this answer asap


What was the conflict in the US v Lopez case?

It had to do with the Court's attempt to apply the Interstate Commerce Laws in a novel and unique way. See below link for a full discussion:


What does the supreme court case us v bagley do?

What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?


What is the Supreme Court case involving guns in a public school zone?

http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-v-lopez


Who won the US Supreme Court case Schenck v. US?

The US won


Did the supreme court case US v Lopez increase the power of the national government?

No, the Supreme Court case US v. Lopez (1995) actually limited the power of the national government. The Court ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, asserting that possessing a gun in a school zone is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce. This decision marked a significant shift towards reinforcing states’ rights and restricting federal overreach in areas not explicitly tied to commerce.


What year was the landmark US Supreme Court case Escobedo v Illinois?

Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964)


What year was the case McCullough v Maryland?

The US Supreme Court handed down a decision on McCullochon March 6, 1819.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)


What did The US Supreme Court case US v Leon established?

because they are stupid and hoe


What was the US Supreme Court case Kent v US about?

Kent v US 1966 is a famous court case involving juveniles and their rights. The decision and outcome of the case included the facts that: 1) there must always be a hearing in the matter of waiver of jurisdiction 2) there must always be assistance of counsel in a hearing of waiver of jurisdiction 3) the plaintiff's counsel must have access to all social records If the judge determines that a waiver of transfer is the right answer there must be a statement of facts based on a full investigation, including a statement of the judge's reasons for the waiver. A waiver of jurisdiction is basically the decision to allow a juvenile to be tried as an adult in criminal court.


The Schenck v US case happened at the end of which war?

World War I