The Supreme Court held that Congress could not regulate firearms in school zones as it did not affect interstate commerce.
oatmeal
I need this answer asap
It had to do with the Court's attempt to apply the Interstate Commerce Laws in a novel and unique way. See below link for a full discussion:
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-v-lopez
The US won
No, the Supreme Court case US v. Lopez (1995) actually limited the power of the national government. The Court ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, asserting that possessing a gun in a school zone is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce. This decision marked a significant shift towards reinforcing states’ rights and restricting federal overreach in areas not explicitly tied to commerce.
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964)
The US Supreme Court handed down a decision on McCullochon March 6, 1819.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
because they are stupid and hoe
Kent v US 1966 is a famous court case involving juveniles and their rights. The decision and outcome of the case included the facts that: 1) there must always be a hearing in the matter of waiver of jurisdiction 2) there must always be assistance of counsel in a hearing of waiver of jurisdiction 3) the plaintiff's counsel must have access to all social records If the judge determines that a waiver of transfer is the right answer there must be a statement of facts based on a full investigation, including a statement of the judge's reasons for the waiver. A waiver of jurisdiction is basically the decision to allow a juvenile to be tried as an adult in criminal court.
World War I