It became easier to govern.
No. Diocletian split the Roman Empire.
Constantine didn't split the Roman Empire. It was Diocletian, and he divided the empire into western and eastern halves.
Who indeed.
In 395 the Roman empire split into two pieces: the west and the east. Rome and Italy were part of the west and Greece was part of the east.
There has never been a Roman emperor who was split in two. If you mean the Roman empire, that too, was never split. The terms Western and Eastern regarding the Roman empire was/is a devise used by historians in their writings so that their readers are able to understand them more clearly. When the western part of the empire fell, the empire continued despite the loss of its western territories. The closest that the empire ever came to being "split" was when Diocletian divided it into four areas with his two Caesars and two Augusti, which were supposed to make the vast Roman territory easier to rule.
Most canals were built after the Roman Empire split, for example the Suez Canal, the Panama Canal, and the Erie Canal.
with a pair of caesars. that is not true
Diocletian.
Once the Roman Empire split in two, the Holy Roman Empire created the Vatican.
Diocletian split the empire into eastern and western halves in order to make governing easier.
The Roman Empire had Split Several times One such time would be Alexander the Great dividing his lands amongst his generals. Where as The Roman split into the East and West Empires Near the Byzantine Empire.
eastern and western